MedPath

Evaluating Use of a Farmers Market Incentive Program Among Low-Income Health Center Patients

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Non-use of Existing State-wide SNAP Incentive Program
Food Insecurity
Interventions
Behavioral: Education
Behavioral: voucher
Registration Number
NCT02558660
Lead Sponsor
University of Michigan
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of a brief clinic-based educational intervention on utilization of Double Up Food Bucks (DUFB)-a Michigan-wide Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) healthy food incentive--among low income health center patients at a community health center in Southeast Michigan.

Detailed Description

Study participants were provided a 3-5 minute explanation of DUFB, written program materials, and initial $10 market voucher. Participants were surveyed four times over five months, and a subset are also participating in post-intervention focus groups.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
177
Inclusion Criteria
  • patient or family member of patient
  • at least 18 years of age
  • currently SNAP-enrolled
  • identifies as one of primary food shoppers for household
  • English or Spanish-speaking
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • under 18
  • not currently SNAP-enrolled
  • not one of primary food shoppers for household
  • unable to complete a telephone survey in English or Spanish
  • unable to provide a working telephone number where they could be contacted
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Double Up Food BucksEducationClinic-based educational intervention about an existing SNAP healthy food incentive program, as well as a $10 voucher to spend on produce at farmers markets
Double Up Food BucksvoucherClinic-based educational intervention about an existing SNAP healthy food incentive program, as well as a $10 voucher to spend on produce at farmers markets
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Prevalence of participant DUFB use over time, as assessed by an interviewer-administered survey using structured open-ended questions5 months

Use of DUFB at baseline assessed with yes/no response. At each of the the 3 follow-up surveys waves (1.5 months, 3 months, and 5 months), participants will be asked if they have used DUFB in the past month (yes/no), and if yes, how many times.

Participant-perceived barriers and facilitators to DUFB use following educational intervention, as assessed by an interviewer-administered survey using structured open-ended questions and semi-structured focus group questions12 months

Through an iterative process, three team members will independently conduct thematic analyses, compared codes, resolve discrepancies, and summarize key thematic findings.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change from baseline fruit and vegetable consumption at 1.5 months, 3 months, and 5 months, as assessed by a validated 2 question fruit and vegetable screenerbaseline, 1.5 months, 3 months, 5 months

Servings/day range from 0 to \>=4 (scale applied separately to fruit consumption and vegetable consumption. Change will be calculated from two time points at each of three follow-up periods (1.5 months, 3 months, and 5 months) minus the baseline

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Ypsilanti Health Center, University of Michigan

🇺🇸

Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath