Evaluating Use of a Farmers Market Incentive Program Among Low-Income Health Center Patients
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 177
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Prevalence of participant DUFB use over time, as assessed by an interviewer-administered survey using structured open-ended questions
研究概览
简要总结
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of a brief clinic-based educational intervention on utilization of Double Up Food Bucks (DUFB)-a Michigan-wide Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) healthy food incentive--among low income health center patients at a community health center in Southeast Michigan.
详细描述
Study participants were provided a 3-5 minute explanation of DUFB, written program materials, and initial $10 market voucher. Participants were surveyed four times over five months, and a subset are also participating in post-intervention focus groups.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Na
- 干预模型
- Single Group
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •patient or family member of patient
- •at least 18 years of age
- •currently SNAP-enrolled
- •identifies as one of primary food shoppers for household
- •English or Spanish-speaking
排除标准
- •not currently SNAP-enrolled
- •not one of primary food shoppers for household
- •unable to complete a telephone survey in English or Spanish
- •unable to provide a working telephone number where they could be contacted
结局指标
主要结局
Prevalence of participant DUFB use over time, as assessed by an interviewer-administered survey using structured open-ended questions
时间窗: 5 months
Use of DUFB at baseline assessed with yes/no response. At each of the the 3 follow-up surveys waves (1.5 months, 3 months, and 5 months), participants will be asked if they have used DUFB in the past month (yes/no), and if yes, how many times.
Participant-perceived barriers and facilitators to DUFB use following educational intervention, as assessed by an interviewer-administered survey using structured open-ended questions and semi-structured focus group questions
时间窗: 12 months
Through an iterative process, three team members will independently conduct thematic analyses, compared codes, resolve discrepancies, and summarize key thematic findings.
次要结局
- Change from baseline fruit and vegetable consumption at 1.5 months, 3 months, and 5 months, as assessed by a validated 2 question fruit and vegetable screener(baseline, 1.5 months, 3 months, 5 months)
研究者
Alicia Cohen
Clinical Lecturer, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholar
University of Michigan