Evaluating Use of a Farmers Market Incentive Program Among Low-Income Health Center Patients
- Conditions
- Non-use of Existing State-wide SNAP Incentive ProgramFood Insecurity
- Interventions
- Behavioral: EducationBehavioral: voucher
- Registration Number
- NCT02558660
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Michigan
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of a brief clinic-based educational intervention on utilization of Double Up Food Bucks (DUFB)-a Michigan-wide Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) healthy food incentive--among low income health center patients at a community health center in Southeast Michigan.
- Detailed Description
Study participants were provided a 3-5 minute explanation of DUFB, written program materials, and initial $10 market voucher. Participants were surveyed four times over five months, and a subset are also participating in post-intervention focus groups.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 177
- patient or family member of patient
- at least 18 years of age
- currently SNAP-enrolled
- identifies as one of primary food shoppers for household
- English or Spanish-speaking
- under 18
- not currently SNAP-enrolled
- not one of primary food shoppers for household
- unable to complete a telephone survey in English or Spanish
- unable to provide a working telephone number where they could be contacted
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Double Up Food Bucks Education Clinic-based educational intervention about an existing SNAP healthy food incentive program, as well as a $10 voucher to spend on produce at farmers markets Double Up Food Bucks voucher Clinic-based educational intervention about an existing SNAP healthy food incentive program, as well as a $10 voucher to spend on produce at farmers markets
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Prevalence of participant DUFB use over time, as assessed by an interviewer-administered survey using structured open-ended questions 5 months Use of DUFB at baseline assessed with yes/no response. At each of the the 3 follow-up surveys waves (1.5 months, 3 months, and 5 months), participants will be asked if they have used DUFB in the past month (yes/no), and if yes, how many times.
Participant-perceived barriers and facilitators to DUFB use following educational intervention, as assessed by an interviewer-administered survey using structured open-ended questions and semi-structured focus group questions 12 months Through an iterative process, three team members will independently conduct thematic analyses, compared codes, resolve discrepancies, and summarize key thematic findings.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change from baseline fruit and vegetable consumption at 1.5 months, 3 months, and 5 months, as assessed by a validated 2 question fruit and vegetable screener baseline, 1.5 months, 3 months, 5 months Servings/day range from 0 to \>=4 (scale applied separately to fruit consumption and vegetable consumption. Change will be calculated from two time points at each of three follow-up periods (1.5 months, 3 months, and 5 months) minus the baseline
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Ypsilanti Health Center, University of Michigan
🇺🇸Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States