MedPath

Short Versus Conventional Plaster Cast Fixation Time in Reduced Distal Radius Fractures

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Colles' Fracture
Interventions
Device: 10-day cast
Registration Number
NCT02798614
Lead Sponsor
Uppsala University Hospital
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes after short versus conventional plaster cast fixation time in reduced distal radius fractures.

Detailed Description

Displaced distal radius fractures treated with closed reduction and plaster cast fixation are radiographed 10 days (range 8-13 days) after reduction and randomized to one of two study arms; immediate removal of plaster cast or continued fixation in plaster cast for another 3 weeks. Radiographic and Clinical outcome measurements at 1, 4 and 12 months

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
109
Inclusion Criteria
  • Distal radius fracture with intact ulna (except for processus styloideus ulnae)
  • Dorsal angulation 5-40 degrees
  • Axial compression < 4 mm
  • Intra articular step-off < 1 mm
  • Low energy trauma
  • Closed fracture
  • Suitable for treatment with closed reduction and plaster cast fixation
Exclusion Criteria
  • Fracture older than 3 Days
  • Previously fractured ipsi- or contralateral wrist
  • Dementia
  • Inflammatory joint disorder

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
10-day cast10-day castRemoval of plaster cast 10 Days after reduction
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Radiographic displacementAt admission, 10 days, 1 month and 12 months

Change in dorsal angulation, radial angulation and axial compression between follow-ups.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Assessment of pain intensity10 days, 1, 4 and 12 months

Average pain over the last 24 h assessed with a visual analogue scale (VAS) at 10 days, 1, 4 and 12 months

Range of motionUninjured side. Injured side at 1, 4 and 12 months

Range of motion in dorsal extension, volar flexion, supination and pronation compared to uninjured side at 1, 4 and 12 months.

Assessment of functional outcome with three different functional assessment scores; 1,The modified de Bruijn wrist score 2, The modified Mayo wrist scoring chart 3, The Gartland and Werley Demerit wrist point system modified by Sarmiento.12 months

The three functional assessment scores are composite outcome measures consisting of multiple measures (results to be reported as single values for each Group),

Grip strengthUninjured side. Injured side at 1, 4 , 12 months

Grip strength compared to uninjured side at 1, 4 and 12 months

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath