Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02798614
NCT02798614
Completed
Not Applicable

A Comparison of Radiographic and Clinical Results After Short Versus Conventional Plaster Cast Fixation Time in Reduced Distal Radius Fractures

Uppsala University Hospital0 sites109 target enrollmentSeptember 2002

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Colles' Fracture
Sponsor
Uppsala University Hospital
Enrollment
109
Primary Endpoint
Radiographic displacement
Status
Completed
Last Updated
9 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes after short versus conventional plaster cast fixation time in reduced distal radius fractures.

Detailed Description

Displaced distal radius fractures treated with closed reduction and plaster cast fixation are radiographed 10 days (range 8-13 days) after reduction and randomized to one of two study arms; immediate removal of plaster cast or continued fixation in plaster cast for another 3 weeks. Radiographic and Clinical outcome measurements at 1, 4 and 12 months

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
September 2002
End Date
January 2010
Last Updated
9 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Albert Christersson

MD

Uppsala University Hospital

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Distal radius fracture with intact ulna (except for processus styloideus ulnae)
  • Dorsal angulation 5-40 degrees
  • Axial compression \< 4 mm
  • Intra articular step-off \< 1 mm
  • Low energy trauma
  • Closed fracture
  • Suitable for treatment with closed reduction and plaster cast fixation

Exclusion Criteria

  • Fracture older than 3 Days
  • Previously fractured ipsi- or contralateral wrist
  • Inflammatory joint disorder

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Radiographic displacement

Time Frame: At admission, 10 days, 1 month and 12 months

Change in dorsal angulation, radial angulation and axial compression between follow-ups.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Assessment of pain intensity(10 days, 1, 4 and 12 months)
  • Range of motion(Uninjured side. Injured side at 1, 4 and 12 months)
  • Assessment of functional outcome with three different functional assessment scores; 1,The modified de Bruijn wrist score 2, The modified Mayo wrist scoring chart 3, The Gartland and Werley Demerit wrist point system modified by Sarmiento.(12 months)
  • Grip strength(Uninjured side. Injured side at 1, 4 , 12 months)

Similar Trials