Disseminating Public Health Evidence to Support State Health Department Prevention of Cancer and Other Chronic Diseases

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Information Dissemination; Evidence-Based Public Health
• Interventions: Other: Dissemination of public health knowledge

• Registration Number: NCT01978054
• Lead Sponsor: Washington University School of Medicine

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to identify and evaluate dissemination strategies to promote the uptake of evidence-based cancer and other chronic disease prevention among state-level public health practitioners. Dissemination strategies such as multi-day in-person training workshops and electronic information exchange modalities are hypothesized to associate with improved access and use of public health evidence and organizational supports for program and policy decision making based on evidence-based public health.

Detailed Description

Evidence-based public health approaches to prevent cancer and other chronic diseases have been identified in recent decades and have the potential for high impact. Yet barriers to implement prevention approaches persist as a result of multiple factors including lack of organizational support, limited resources, competing priorities, and limited skill among the public health workforce. The purpose of this study was to learn how best to promote the adoption of evidence based public health practice related to chronic disease prevention. This cluster randomized trial aimed to evaluate the dissemination of public health knowledge about evidence-based prevention of cancer and other chronic diseases and test receptivity and usefulness of dissemination strategies directed toward state health department chronic disease practitioners to enhance capacity and organizational support for evidence-based chronic disease prevention. Twelve state health department chronic disease units were randomly selected and assigned to intervention or control. State health department staff and the university-based study team jointly identified, refined, and selected dissemination strategies. Intervention strategies included multi-day in-person training workshops, remote telephone follow-up and technical assistance, supplemental brief remote trainings, and health department work unit procedural changes to support and strengthen evidence-based decision making. Evaluation methods included pre-post surveys and structured qualitative phone interviews.

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2013-09
• Study First Submitted: 2013-10-31
• Study First Submitted QC: 2013-10-31
• Study First Posted: 2013-11-07
• Primary Completion: 2016-11
• Study Completion: 2018-03
• Status Verified: 2018-07
• Last Update Submitted: 2018-07-03
• Last Update Posted: 2018-07-06

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 1703

Inclusion Criteria

• State Health Department chronic disease units (cluster) in the United States and corresponding public health workforce (individuals within cluster)

Read More

Exclusion Criteria

• State health department has received extensive technical assistance and training comparable to our intervention (dissemination activities)
• Origin state has no logical matching pair matched state based on state population size
• Origin state has the lowest excess burden of cancer and other chronic risk and disease
• Origin state health department has lowest or highest capacity for EBDM as determined from previous research

Read More

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Dissemination	Dissemination of public health knowledge	Dissemination of public health knowledge: Participating states will help develop and choose 3-5 dissemination strategies they prefer for their state health department chronic disease units to receive. Dissemination strategies may include multi-day in-person training workshops, electronic information exchange modalities, and information on ways to enhance organizational climates favorable to evidence-based chronic disease prevention.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Organizational supports for evidence-based decision making (EBDM)	18-24 months post baseline	Self-report Likert scale items in 4 factors: access to evidence and skilled staff, program evaluation, supervisory expectations and incentives for EBDM, and participatory decision-making

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
EBDM competencies	18-24 months post baseline	Self-report Likert scale items measure perceived importance and availability of specific public health practitioner skill sets for EBDM
Use of research evidence for job tasks	18-24 months post baseline	Self-report frequency items for 6 job tasks, summary variable creating by calculating the mean frequency across the tasks

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Prevention Research Center in St. Louis, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis; 🇺🇸 Saint Louis, Missouri, United States