Electromagnetic Navigation System Versus Freehand Technique in Total Hip Arthroplasty
- Conditions
- Hip Osteoarthritis
- Interventions
- Procedure: Electromagnetic navigationProcedure: Freehand
- Registration Number
- NCT04101864
- Lead Sponsor
- Valdoltra Orthopedic Hospital
- Brief Summary
A prospective randomized study comparing accuracy and precision of acetabular component placement in total hip arthroplasty with use of novel electromagnetic navigation system versus freehand technique.
- Detailed Description
Patients with hip arthritis, who are to be treated with total hip arthroplasty will be randomized in two groups. Patents allocated to study group will get their acetabular components implanted with the help of electromagnetic navigation system. Patients allocated to the control group will get their acetabular components implanted with freehand technique. Accuracy and precision of implanted acetabular components will be assessed on images obtained by postoperative computed tomography. Postoperative inclination and anteversion angles of acetabular components will be measured by the independent technician. Results will be statistically analyzed and compared.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 84
- age above 18 years
- unilateral surgery
- osteoarthritis of the hip
- no previous surgery on the affected hip
- implantation of the same acetabular component through the same approach
- signed informed consent
- age under 18 years
- unwilling to participate
- prior surgery on affected hip
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Electromagnetic navigation Electromagnetic navigation In the study group acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty will be placed with the help of electromagnetic image-less navigation system. Reference plane will be anterior pelvic plane. Freehand Freehand In the control group acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty will be placed with the help of the freehand technique.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Acetabular component position Up to 48 hours after surgery Comparison of the precision and the accuracy of acetabular components between both groups
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Surgical time Immediately after surgical procedure Comparison of duration of surgery between both groups
Clinical result 8-10 weeks postoperatively Comparison of improvement of Harris hip score between both groups
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Valdoltra Orthopedic Hospital
🇸🇮Ankaran, Slovenia
Valdoltra Orthopedic Hospital🇸🇮Ankaran, Slovenia