MedPath

Behavioral Intervention in Reducing Indoor Tanning

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Healthy Subject
Interventions
Other: Questionnaire Administration
Other: Internet-Based Intervention
Registration Number
NCT03448224
Lead Sponsor
Jerod L Stapleton, PhD
Brief Summary

This randomized clinical trial tests the efficacy of a behavioral intervention works in reducing indoor tanning. Artificial ultraviolet indoor tanning increases the chance of developing skin cancers. Behavioral interventions use techniques to help participants change the way they react to environmental triggers that may cause a negative reaction.

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

To develop and evaluate an online tailored indoor tanning (IT) intervention based on findings from phase 1.

OUTLINE:

INTERVENTION: Participants are randomized to 1 of 2 groups.

GROUP I: Participants receive intervention, weekly text messages about IT reduction, and personalized booster intervention. Participants then receive text messages twice weekly for 4 weeks.

GROUP II: Participants are placed on wait-list and may receive full intervention after follow-up.

After completion of study, patients are followed up at 3 months.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
54
Inclusion Criteria
  • Use of IT at least 25 times in the past year
  • Women
Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Group II (wait-list)Questionnaire AdministrationParticipants are placed on wait-list and may receive full intervention after follow-up.
Group I (web-based Indoor Tanning intervention)Internet-Based InterventionParticipants receive intervention, weekly text messages about IT reduction, and personalized booster intervention. Participants then receive text messages twice weekly for 4 weeks.
Group I (web-based Indoor Tanning intervention)Questionnaire AdministrationParticipants receive intervention, weekly text messages about IT reduction, and personalized booster intervention. Participants then receive text messages twice weekly for 4 weeks.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of Prior 2-Month Indoor Tanning Sessions Reported by Participants on a Follow-up SurveyUp to 3 months

On the follow-up assessment administered 3 months after the baseline assessment, participants will estimate the number of times they used a tanning bed or booth with tanning lamps in the past 2 months with an open-ended response.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Intentions to Use Indoor TanningUp to 3 months

For tanning intentions, participants indicated how likely they were to use an indoor tanning bed in the next year on a 6-point response scale anchored with 1 = Extremely unlikely and 6 = Extremely likely

Perceived Difficulty (Self-efficacy) in Quitting TanningAt 3 months post-intervention

Measured at post-intervention data collection (3 months post intervention) using single item assessment: "How hard would it be for you to stop using tanning beds/booths?" (Please answer on a scale for 0-10, where 0 is "Not at all hard", 10 is "Extremely hard").

SunburnsUp to 3 months

On the follow-up assessment administered 3 months after the baseline assessment, participants will estimate the number of times they had a sunburn in the past 2 months with an open-ended response.

Number of Participants Expressing Positive Interest in Changing Tanning3 months

Interest in changing tanning was assessed using a single item: Would you like to reduce or quit indoor tanning if you could do so easily? Responses coded as 0 = no and 1 = yes

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Kentucky

🇺🇸

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath