ROSA Total Knee Post Market Study EMEA
- Conditions
- Chronic OsteoarthritisKnee PainRheumatoid ArthritisModerate Varus, Valgus or Flexion DeformitiesAvascular Necrosis of the Femoral Condyle
- Registration Number
- NCT04338893
- Lead Sponsor
- Zimmer Biomet
- Brief Summary
This is a prospective, multicenter clinical study designed to facilitate the collection and evaluation of surgical workflow efficiency, patient pain and function outcome and adverse events data. This study might include Persona, Nexgen and Vanguard product families using the ROSA Total Knee Robotic system or conventional instrumentation. The primary objective is to evaluate the accuracy of implant alignment for ROSA Total Knee robotic instrumentation compared to conventional instrumentation.
- Detailed Description
The main purpose of this study is to collect and compare clinical outcomes data using the commercially available ROSA Total Knee robotic instrumentation and conventional instrumentation. This will be achieved by assessing: planned vs actual component positioning, operative workflow efficiency, patient safety based on incidence and frequency of adverse events, clinical performance measured by overall pain and function, health-related quality of life data and radiographic parameters.
The primary endpoint will report on the accuracy of implant alignment for ROSA Total Knee robotic instrumentation compared to conventional and the secondary endpoints will record surgery time points and evaluate the change of clinical outcomes scores between baseline and post operative follow up for performance and clinical benefits
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 252
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Evaluate the accuracy of implant alignment for ROSA total knee robotic instrumentation compared to conventional instrumentation 1 year measuring femoral rotation in the axial plane using pre and post op CT assessments
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Measure operative workflow efficiency by recording following time points during surgery 1 year time points recorded are: patient in-and out time, incision- and incision closed time
Evaluate Health related quality of life at baseline and each post-operative follow up 1 year EQ-5D-5L health questionnaireEuroqol-5 dimensions by the EuroQol Group consists of a descriptive system of health-related quality of life by a questionnaire and a thermometer scale. The Questionnaire comprises five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) with each 5 levels: no problems (level 1), slight problems (level 2), moderate problems, (level 3) severe problems (level 4) and extreme problems (level 5). The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number and may be converted to a score (maximum is 1), defined by the health state classification.The Thermometer generates a self rating of current health-related quality of life and has end points of 100 (best imaginable health state) at the top, and 0 (worst imaginable health state) at the bottom. It should be used with the 5-digit health state classification to build a composite picture of the respondent's health status.
Evaluate knee functionality at baseline and each post-operative follow up 1 year Objective Knee Assessment is used to assess knee functionality by the investigator with objective knee indicators (2011 The Knee Society) up to 100 points. A higher score means a better functional outcome
Evaluate patient satisfaction at baseline (first postop visit) and each post operative follow up 1 year Patients to provide additional information regarding the level of satisfaction with the operated knee by answering 4 questions with 4 options to answer from very satisfied, satisfied, dissatisfied to very dissatisfied
Evaluate the change of the Oxford Knee Score between baseline and each post-operative follow up 1 year Oxford Knee Score is a patient-reported form and consists of 12 questions on the influence of the knee (surgical side) on daily activities or pain. The patient scores each question (item) from 0 to 4 with 0 being the worst outcome and 4 being the best outcome. The scores are then summed to produce an overall score running from 0 (worst possible) to 48 (best outcome).
Evaluate Pain intensity at baseline and each post-operative follow up 1 year NRS Pain (Numeric Rating Scale for Pain). NRS Pain is a numeric scale from 0 to 10 to measure pain intensity from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain)
Evaluate awareness of patients affected knee joint at baseline and each post operative follow up 1 year FJS-12 is a patient-reported form and consist of 12 questions to assess awareness of patients affected knee joint in daily activities.all responses are summed (never, 0 points; almost never, 1 point; seldom, 2 points; sometimes, 3 points; mostly, 4 points) and then divided by the number of completed items. This mean value is subsequently multiplied by 25 to obtain a total score range of 0 top 100. A high score indicate a high degree of "forgetting" the artificial joint, i.e. a lower degree of awareness.
Trial Locations
- Locations (6)
Herzogin Elisabeth Hospital
🇩🇪Braunschweig, Germany
Evangelisches Waldkrankenhaus Spandau
🇩🇪Spandau, Germany
San Giuseppe Hospital
🇮🇹Arezzo, Italy
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc
🇧🇪Brussels, Belgium
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève
🇨🇭Geneva, Switzerland
The Research Fund of Hadassah Medical Organization
🇮🇱Jerusalem, Israel