Valutazione Retrospettiva Multicentrica e Risultati Delle Strategie Terapeutiche Nei Pazienti Adolescenti o Giovani Adulti (AYA). Studio di Collaborazione Fra AIEOP e FIL

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) represents approximately 0.5% of cancer diagnosis each year in developed countries (1, 2). This translates to an annual incidence of 8500 individuals per year in the United States and an incidence rate of 2.49 per 100.000 lymphoid malignancies in Europe (2, 3). A classical bimodal distribution is reported with a first peak occurring in patients between the ages of 15 and 30 years and a second peak in those older than 55 years (4). HL is one of the most common malignancies to occur in the adolescent and young adult (AYA) population. This population is defined by the National Cancer Institute as people diagnosed with cancer between the ages of 15 and 39 years.

The choice of therapy for AYA patients is typically determined by the treatment setting and referral patterns. Patients who are younger than 18 years are usually referred to pediatric Centers, where many patients are treated in the context of clinical trials. For patients treated by adult haematologists many are treated in the community setting.

Considerable variability exists between the treatment of adult and pediatric patients, including the choice of chemotherapeutic agents and the role of radiation. In both the pediatric and adult settings there has been increasing focus on balancing the risk of relapse with the risk of secondary side effects. De-intensification for low-risk patients using PET-adapted strategies is a modern approach that has been applied to all patients with HL independent of age. Variability among age groups still results in uncertainty regarding the optimal treatment approach in the AYA population.

This is a retrospective observational study involving Italian Centers that treat adolescents and young adults Hodgkin lymphoma patients. This type of patients can be treated either in a Pediatric Institution or in Adult Institution with different supportive and therapeutical approaches.

The primary objectives will be overall survival according to different treatment. Secondary end points will be acute or late complications comparing different treatments choice in an homogeneous group of patients, progression free survival according to different treatment.