MedPath

Does the Aid of MelaFind Affect Clinical Management Decisions

Completed
Conditions
Melanoma
Registration Number
NCT01387581
Lead Sponsor
MELA Sciences, Inc.
Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to determine and compare the performance of dermatologists (in Germany) on the excision decision against the performance of MelaFind, a non-invasive and objective multi-spectral computer vision system designed as a tool to aid dermatologists in the detection of early melanoma. The hypothesis is that MelaFind's sensitivity is superior to the average excisions sensitivity of dermatologists.

Another objective is to determine and compare the performance of dermatologists (in Germany) with and without the aid of MelaFind. The hypothesis is that the average excision sensitivity of dermatologists with the aid of MelaFind is superior to the average excision sensitivity of dermatologists without the aid of MelaFind.

A similar study was previously conducted with dermatologists in the US (NCT01011153). An exploratory objective is to compare the excision decisions of dermatologists from the previous study (in the US) to dermatologists in in this study (in Germany).

Detailed Description

Early detection of melanoma is critical for favorable prognosis, since patients with earlier stage melanomas have a much higher probability of survival than with later stages. The traditional method of early detection has been with serial total body skin exams where the health care provider examines all skin surfaces, including mucosa, for suspicious pigmented lesions. The diagnostic performance of dermatologists for melanoma depends on the level of dermatological training. More important than being able to make a diagnosis of melanoma on clinical impression is the ability to make an appropriate decision to excise the lesion. To aid dermatologists in the detection of early melanoma, MelaFind was developed, a non-invasive and objective multi-spectral computer vision system technology. It was designed to generate output - MelaFind Positive or MelaFind Negative- for consideration in the lesion management decisions.

This survey study will determine and compare the average excision sensitivity to melanoma and specificity of dermatologists (in Germany) without MelaFind output to the average excision sensitivity to melanoma and specificity of dermatologists (in Germany) with MelaFind output. Another purpose is to determine and compare the sensitivity to melanoma and specificity of MelaFind to the average excision sensitivity to melanoma and specificity of dermatologists without MelaFind output.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
227
Inclusion Criteria

-Only board certified dermatologists

Exclusion Criteria

-May not have previously participated in MELA Protocols 20061, 20081 or 20063

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
SensitivityWithin 120 days of Data Lock

Dermatologist sensitivity is the percent of melanomas that dermatologists selected to biopsy. MelaFind sensitivity is the percent of melanomas that MelaFind called "Positive."

SpecificityWithin 120 days of Data Lock

Dermatologist specificity is the percent of non-melanomas that dermatologists selected not to biopsy. MelaFind specificity is the percent of non-melanomas that MelaFind called "Negative."

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

MELA Sciences

🇺🇸

Irvington, New York, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath