Developing and Testing an Implementation Strategy for Active Learning to Promote Physical Activity in Children
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Physical Activity
- Sponsor
- The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
- Enrollment
- 301
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Acceptability of Active Learning Among Teachers as Assessed by the Acceptability of Implementation Measure (AIM)
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 3 months ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to develop an implementation strategy to improve the use and sustainment of active learning in elementary schools and to conduct a feasibility study to evaluate the impact of the developed implementation strategy on the implementation and effectiveness of active learning.
Investigators
Timothy J Walker
Assistant Professor
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •lead teachers who teach kindergarten to fifth grade
- •children in kindergarten to fifth grade
Exclusion Criteria
- •non English or Spanish speaking
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Acceptability of Active Learning Among Teachers as Assessed by the Acceptability of Implementation Measure (AIM)
Time Frame: Baseline
The Acceptability of Implementation Measure (AIM) total score is from 1 to 5, with higher scores representing higher levels of acceptability.
Acceptability of Active Learning Among Teachers as Assessed by the Acceptability of Implementation Measure (AIM)
Time Frame: Approximately 7 months after baseline
The Acceptability of Implementation Measure (AIM) total score is from 1 to 5, with higher scores representing higher levels of acceptability.
Acceptability of Active Learning Among Teachers as Assessed by the Acceptability of Implementation Measure (AIM)
Time Frame: Approximately 13 months after baseline
The Acceptability of Implementation Measure (AIM) total score is from 1 to 5, with higher scores representing higher levels of acceptability.
Implementation Fidelity as Assessed by Self-reported Implementation Logs to Assess Dose of Delivery
Time Frame: Baseline
Implementation logs will be completed weekly throughout the study and dose of delivery is the number of minutes per day of active learning used.
Implementation Fidelity as Assessed by Self-reported Implementation Logs to Assess Dose of Delivery
Time Frame: Approximately 7 months after baseline
Implementation logs will be completed weekly throughout the study and dose of delivery is the number of minutes per week of active learning used.
Implementation Fidelity as Assessed by Self-reported Implementation Logs to Assess Dose of Delivery
Time Frame: Approximately 13 months after baseline
Implementation logs will be completed weekly throughout the study and dose of delivery is the number of minutes per day of active learning used.
Implementation Fidelity as Assessed by Teacher Survey of Dose of Delivery
Time Frame: Baseline
Dose of delivery is the number of minutes per day of active learning used.
Implementation Fidelity as Assessed by Teacher Survey of Dose of Delivery
Time Frame: Approximately 7 months after baseline
Dose of delivery is the number of minutes per day of active learning used.
Implementation Fidelity as Assessed by Teacher Survey of Dose of Delivery
Time Frame: Approximately 13 months after baseline
Dose of delivery is the number of minutes per day of active learning used.
Student Physical Activity as Indicated by Number of Minutes Per Day Spent in Moderate and Vigorous Physical Activity as Assessed by the Actigraph GT3X+ Accelerometer
Time Frame: Baseline
Student Physical Activity as Indicated by Number of Minutes Per Day Spent in Moderate and Vigorous Physical Activity as Assessed by the Actigraph GT3X+ Accelerometer
Time Frame: Approximately 7 months after baseline
Student Physical Activity as Indicated by Number of Minutes Per Day Spent in Moderate and Vigorous Physical Activity as Assessed by the Actigraph GT3X+ Accelerometer
Time Frame: Approximately 13 months after baseline