MedPath

A Study Comparing Mircera and Epoetin Alfa for the Treatment of Anemia in Dialysis Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.

Phase 3
Terminated
Conditions
Anemia
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT00422513
Lead Sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Brief Summary

This 2 arm study will compare 'time and motion' (provider time spent on anemia management) and effect on hemoglobin (Hb) levels, of methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta (Mircera) and epoetin alfa, in anemic patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on hemodialysis. Patients stable on intravenous (iv) epoetin alfa will be randomized either to receive standard of care therapy (epoetin alfa (iv) 3 times weekly), or to receive Mircera 120-360 micrograms (iv), monthly. After a titration period, average time spent on anemia treatment over a 3 month period will be evaluated. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
TERMINATED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
260
Inclusion Criteria
  • adult patients, >=18 years of age;
  • CKD (stage V) on outpatient hemodialysis therapy for >= 3 months;
  • CKD-related anemia treated with epoetin alfa iv 3x/week for >= 3 months;
  • average hemoglobin (Hb) 10-12 g/dL over last 3 months.
Exclusion Criteria
  • failed renal transplant within 12 months prior to screening;
  • poorly controlled hypertension;
  • previous treatment with Mircera.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Epoetin AlfaEpoetin alfaAs prescribed, (iv), 3 times weekly
methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin betamethoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta120-360 micrograms (iv) monthly, starting dose
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Time Spent on Anemia Treatment Over Evaluation PeriodMonths 5-7

Efficacy and pharmacoeconomics analyses were not performed.

Change in Hemoglobin (Hb) Concentration From Baseline to the Average Over the Evaluation PeriodBaseline, Months 5-7

Efficacy and pharmacoeconomics analyses were not performed.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of Participants Assessed for AEsMonth 1 to 15 day follow up post month 7

The adverse events are captured in the adverse event and serious adverse event section of this database.

The Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities Occurring in ≥5% of the ParticipantsBaseline, Month 1 to Month 7

A marked laboratory abnormality was defined as a test result that was outside of the marked abnormality range and that also represented a clinically relevant change from baseline of at least a designated amount.

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath