A Study Comparing Mircera and Epoetin Alfa for the Treatment of Anemia in Dialysis Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.
- Conditions
- Anemia
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT00422513
- Lead Sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Brief Summary
This 2 arm study will compare 'time and motion' (provider time spent on anemia management) and effect on hemoglobin (Hb) levels, of methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta (Mircera) and epoetin alfa, in anemic patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on hemodialysis. Patients stable on intravenous (iv) epoetin alfa will be randomized either to receive standard of care therapy (epoetin alfa (iv) 3 times weekly), or to receive Mircera 120-360 micrograms (iv), monthly. After a titration period, average time spent on anemia treatment over a 3 month period will be evaluated. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 260
- adult patients, >=18 years of age;
- CKD (stage V) on outpatient hemodialysis therapy for >= 3 months;
- CKD-related anemia treated with epoetin alfa iv 3x/week for >= 3 months;
- average hemoglobin (Hb) 10-12 g/dL over last 3 months.
- failed renal transplant within 12 months prior to screening;
- poorly controlled hypertension;
- previous treatment with Mircera.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Epoetin Alfa Epoetin alfa As prescribed, (iv), 3 times weekly methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta 120-360 micrograms (iv) monthly, starting dose
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time Spent on Anemia Treatment Over Evaluation Period Months 5-7 Efficacy and pharmacoeconomics analyses were not performed.
Change in Hemoglobin (Hb) Concentration From Baseline to the Average Over the Evaluation Period Baseline, Months 5-7 Efficacy and pharmacoeconomics analyses were not performed.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of Participants Assessed for AEs Month 1 to 15 day follow up post month 7 The adverse events are captured in the adverse event and serious adverse event section of this database.
The Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities Occurring in ≥5% of the Participants Baseline, Month 1 to Month 7 A marked laboratory abnormality was defined as a test result that was outside of the marked abnormality range and that also represented a clinically relevant change from baseline of at least a designated amount.