A clinical study to see the effects of two different methods of fluid administration (small fluid volume estimated by anaesthetist compared with volume estimated by a machine) during ovarian cancer surgery
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: C569- Malignant neoplasm of unspecifiedovaryHealth Condition 2: C569- Malignant neoplasm of unspecifiedovaryHealth Condition 3: null- Patients of Ovarian cancer undergoing cytoreductive surgery
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2016/04/006873
- Lead Sponsor
- Tata Medical center Kolkata
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 144
Cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer-
PDS: primary (chemo-naïve patients including completion staging/ primary debulking and secondary cytoreduction)
IDS: interval debulking surgery (after chemotherapy)
-American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA-PS) score of 1 â?? 3
-Age more than 18 years and less than 65 years
-Surgery of duration more than 240 minutes
-Presumed blood loss more than 500 ml
-Elective surgery
-Patient refusal
-Inability to give consent
-Laparoscopic surgery, Emergency surgery, patients undergoing HIPEC
-Age younger than 18 years & more than 65 yrs, BMI > 40
-Patients with LVEF < 30%, Arrhythmia, Acute MI (within 30 days)
-COPD with FEV1 < 50%
-Coagulopathy (platelet <50000/μL, aPTT > x2 control, INR >1.5)
-Significant liver dysfunction (liver enzymes >x3 times normal)
-Significant renal dysfunction (creatinine >x2 times normal)
-Psychiatric disorders
-Sepsis or SIRS
-Hypersensitivity to Gelofusine
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method