An Open-Label, Long-Term Extension Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Tapinarof Cream, 1% in Subjects With Atopic Dermatitis
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Intervention
- Tapinarof cream, 1%
- Conditions
- Atopic Dermatitis
- Sponsor
- Organon and Co
- Enrollment
- 728
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Events
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 8 months ago
Overview
Brief Summary
This is an open-label, long-term multicenter, study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of topical tapinarof cream, 1% in subjects with atopic dermatitis. Subjects in this study have completed treatment in one of two Phase 3 pivotal studies (DMVT-505-3101 or DMVT-505-3102) or completed treatment in the DMVT-505-2104 study, or directly enrolled into this study. This study will consist of up to 48 weeks of treatment and a 1 week safety follow-up period.
Detailed Description
At the completion of the Week 8 visit of study DMVT-505-3101 (NCT05014568) or study DMVT-505-3102 (NCT05032859) or the Day 28 visit of study DMVT-505-2104 (NCT05186805) (Day 1 \[Baseline\] in this study), all eligible subjects will be offered enrollment in this open-label long-term extension (OL-LTE) study. Approximately 125 additional pediatric subjects ages 2 to \< 18 years who are not eligible for participation in the Phase 3 pivotal studies (DMVT-505-3101 or DMVT-505-3102) will be enrolled directly into this OL-LTE study. Study visits during the treatment period for all subjects will occur every 4 weeks (± 3 days). The total duration of study participation will be approximately 48 weeks for rollover subjects (Baseline to Final Visit) with a 1-week Safety Follow-up Period and approximately 52 weeks for direct-enrolling subjects (Screening to Final Visit) with a 1-week Safety Follow-up Period.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •For Roll-over Subjects Only:
- •Met the criteria as a Study Completer in one of three studies (DMVT-505-3101 study, DMVT-505-3102 study, or DMVT-505-2104 study).
- •Must not be pregnant at Baseline
- •For Direct-Enrolling Subjects Only:
- •Male and female subjects ages 2 years to \< 18 years at the time of consent with clinical diagnosis of AD
- •Subjects with a vIGA-AD™ score of ≥ 3 and AD covering ≥ 40% of the BSA at Screening and Baseline (pre-randomization), or subjects with a vIGA-AD™ score of 2 at Screening and Baseline (pre-randomization) regardless of BSA. Subjects must have screened for the DMVT-505-3101 or DMVT-505-3102 study and failed to meet BSA and/or vIGA-AD™ eligibility criteria.
- •AD present for at least 6 months for ages 6 years old and above or 3 months for ages 2 to 5 years old
- •Must not be pregnant at Screening or Baseline
- •For All Subjects:
- •Female subjects of childbearing potential who are engaging in sexual activity that could lead to pregnancy should use acceptable birth control methods
Exclusion Criteria
- •For Rollover Subjects Only:
- •Subjects who were not receiving study drug at the time of the last visit in the pivotal study (DMVT-505-3101, DMVT-505-3102, or DMVT-505-2104)
- •Used a prohibited concomitant product or procedure to treat AD during the pivotal study.
- •Had an SAE that was related to treatment or experienced an AE that led to permanent discontinuation of treatment in the pivotal study.
- •Pregnant females
- •For Direct-Enrolling Subjects:
- •Immunocompromised at screening
- •Chronic or acute systemic or superficial infection requiring treatment with systemic antibacterials or antifungals within one week prior to baseline visit
- •Significant dermatological or inflammatory condition other than AD that, in the Investigator's opinion, would make it difficult to interpret data or assessments during the study
- •Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≥2.0x the upper limit of normal (ULN).
Arms & Interventions
tapinarof cream
Subjects entering with vIGA-AD (Validated Investigator Global Assessment of Atopic Dermatitis) ≥1 receive treatment with study drug until they achieve vIGA-AD=0, at which time treatment is discontinued and subjects are monitored for durability of response (remittive response). If/when disease worsening occurs (vIGA-AD ≥2), treatment is re-initiated and continued until vIGA-AD =0 is achieved. Subjects entering with a vIGA-AD=0 discontinue treatment and are monitored for duration of remittive response. If/when disease worsening occurs (vIGA-AD ≥2), treatment is re-initiated and continued until vIGA-AD =0 is achieved. This treatment and re-treatment pattern of use continue until the end of the study.
Intervention: Tapinarof cream, 1%
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 49
For rollover subjects, all AEs reported in this extension study were considered as TEAEs except for those AEs ongoing at the end of previous studies but resolved prior to the Visit 1 date for this extension study. For direct-enrolling subjects, all AEs that start after the first dose of study drug will be considered a TEAE.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Values (U/L)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 48
The mean chemistry parameters were assessed for changes and trends over the course of the study.
Frequency of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 49
All AEs reported in this extension study were considered as TEAEs except for those AEs ongoing at the end of previous studies but resolved prior to the Visit 1 date for this extension study. Subjects could have reported more than one TEAE.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Values (g/L)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 48
The mean chemistry and hematology parameters were assessed for changes and trends over the course of the study.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Values (mmol/L)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 48
The mean chemistry parameters were assessed for changes and trends over the course of the study.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Values (Umol/L)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 48
The mean chemistry parameters were assessed for changes and trends over the course of the study.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Values (pg)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 48
The hematology parameter, Ery. Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin was assessed for changes and trends over the course of the study.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Values (10^12 Cells/L)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 48
The hematology parameter, Erythrocytes, was assessed for changes and trends over the course of the study.
Complete Disease Clearance During LTE: Number of Subjects Achieving Disease Clearance vIGA-AD =0 (Clear) While on Therapy for Subjects Entered LTE vIGA-AD ≥ 1 (Almost Clear )
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 48
The vIGA-AD is a clinical tool for assessing the current state/severity of a subject's atopic dermatitis at a given timepoint. It is a static 5-point (0-4) morphological assessment of overall disease severity (scalp excluded), as determined by the investigator, using the clinical characteristics of erythema, induration/papulation, lichenification, oozing/crusting. Higher vIGA-AD scores represents more severe disease.
Response During LTE: Number of Subjects Achieving vIGA-AD =0 or 1 (Clear or Almost Clear) While on Therapy for Subjects Who Entered LTE With vIGA-AD ≥ 2 (Mild)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 48
The vIGA-AD is a clinical tool for assessing the current state/severity of a subject's atopic dermatitis at a given timepoint. It is a static 5-point (0-4) morphological assessment of overall disease severity (scalp excluded), as determined by the investigator, using the clinical characteristics of erythema, induration/papulation, lichenification, oozing/crusting. Higher vIGA-AD scores represents more severe disease.
Absolute Change From Baseline in %BSA Affected
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 48
Subjects received treatment with tapinarof intermittently guided by disease severity. This outcome measure assesses the change from baseline in %BSA affected in all subjects, including those on and those off therapy. Assessment of BSA with Atopic Dermatitis was estimated by means of the handprint method, where the full palmar hand of the participant (fully extended palm, fingers and thumb together) represented approximately 1% of the total BSA. Body regions are assigned specific number of handprints with percentage \[Head and neck = 10% (10 handprints), upper extremities = 20% (20 handprints), Trunk (including axillae and groin) = 30% (30 handprints), lower extremities (including buttocks) = 40% (40 handprints)\]. Lesions on the scalp will not be included in the calculation of %BSA affected. Estimates of the % involvement in each body region will be multiplied by the fraction of total body area to obtain the total %BSA involved by region and overall.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Values (10^9 Cells/L)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 48
The mean hematology parameters were assessed for changes and trends over the course of the study.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Values (%)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 48
The mean hematology parameters were assessed for changes and trends over the course of the study.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Values (L/L)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 48
The hematology parameter, Hematocrit, was assessed for changes and trends over the course of the study.
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Values (fl)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 48
The hematology parameter, Ery. Mean Corpuscular Volume, was assessed for changes and trends over the course of the study.
Percent Change From Baseline in %BSA Affected
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 48
Subjects received treatment with tapinarof intermittently guided by disease severity. This outcome measure assesses the % change from baseline in %BSA affected in all subjects, including those on and those off therapy. Assessment of BSA with Atopic Dermatitis was estimated by means of the handprint method, where the full palmar hand of the participant (fully extended palm, fingers and thumb together) represented approximately 1% of the total BSA. Body regions are assigned specific number of handprints with percentage \[Head and neck = 10% (10 handprints), upper extremities = 20% (20 handprints), Trunk (including axillae and groin) = 30% (30 handprints), lower extremities (including buttocks) = 40% (40 handprints)\]. Lesions on the scalp will not be included in the calculation of %BSA affected. Estimates of the % involvement in each body region will be multiplied by the fraction of total body area to obtain the total %BSA involved by region and overall.
Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 48
Subjects received treatment with tapinarof intermittently guided by disease severity. This outcome measure assesses the % change from baseline in EASI score in all subjects, including those on and those off therapy. The EASI scoring system is a clinical tool that quantifies the severity of a subject's AD based on both lesion severity and %BSA affected. The EASI is a composite score ranging from 0 to 72 that takes into account the degree of erythema, edema/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification (each scored from 0 to 3 separately) for each of four body regions, with adjustment for the %BSA involved for each body region relative to the whole body. The subject's scalp is excluded from this assessment. Higher EASI scores indicate more severe disease.
Mean Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 48
Subjects received treatment with tapinarof intermittently guided by disease severity. This outcome measure assesses the change from baseline in EASI score in all subjects, including those on and those off therapy. The EASI scoring system is a clinical tool that quantifies the severity of a subject's AD based on both lesion severity and %BSA affected. The EASI is a composite score ranging from 0 to 72 that takes into account the degree of erythema, edema/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification (each scored from 0 to 3 separately) for each of four body regions, with adjustment for the %BSA involved for each body region relative to the whole body. The subject's scalp is excluded from this assessment. Higher EASI scores indicate more severe disease.
Percent of Subjects With ≥ 50% Improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) From Baseline at Week 48.
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 48
The EASI scoring system is a clinical tool that quantifies the severity of a subject's AD based on both lesion severity and %BSA affected. The EASI is a composite score ranging from 0 to 72 that takes into account the degree of erythema, edema/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification (each scored from 0 to 3 separately) for each of four body regions, with adjustment for the %BSA involved for each body region relative to the whole body. Higher EASI scores indicate more severe disease.
Percent of Subjects With ≥ 75% Improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) From Baseline at Week 48.
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 48
The EASI scoring system is a clinical tool that quantifies the severity of a subject's AD based on both lesion severity and %BSA affected. The EASI is a composite score ranging from 0 to 72 that takes into account the degree of erythema, edema/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification (each scored from 0 to 3 separately) for each of four body regions, with adjustment for the %BSA involved for each body region relative to the whole body. The subject's scalp is excluded from this assessment. Higher EASI scores indicate more severe disease.
Percent of Subjects With ≥ 90% Improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) From Baseline at Week 48.
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 48
The EASI scoring system is a clinical tool that quantifies the severity of a subject's AD based on both lesion severity and %BSA affected. The EASI is a composite score ranging from 0 to 72 that takes into account the degree of erythema, edema/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification (each scored from 0 to 3 separately) for each of four body regions, with adjustment for the %BSA involved for each body region relative to the whole body. The subject's scalp is excluded from this assessment. Higher EASI scores indicate more severe disease.
Mean Change in Peak Pruritis-Numeric Rating Scale (PP-NRS) From Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 48
The Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP-NRS) is used to quickly assess itch/pruritus severity over a 24-hour period. The PP-NRS is scored on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being "no itch" and 10 being "worst itch imaginable". The subject or caregiver will utilize the scale to assess peak pruritis once per day and record the results in their diaries. The daily ratings are averaged to generate a score for the week.
Number of Subjects With a Baseline Peak Pruritis-Numeric Rating Scale (PP-NRS) Score ≥ 4 Who Achieve ≥ 4-point Reduction in the PP-NRS From Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 48
The Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP-NRS) is used to quickly assess itch/pruritus severity over a 24-hour period. The PP-NRS is scored on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being "no itch" and 10 being "worst itch imaginable". The subject or caregiver will utilize the scale to assess peak pruritis once per day and record the results in their diaries. The daily ratings are averaged to generate a score for the week.
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs - Pulse
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 48
The mean vital sign parameters were assessed for changes and trends over the course of the study. Shifts from Baseline in vital sign parameters were assessed for clinical relevance.
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs - Blood Pressure (Systolic and Diastolic)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 48
The mean vital sign parameters were assessed for changes and trends over the course of the study. Shifts from Baseline in vital sign parameters were assessed for clinical relevance.
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs - Temperature
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 48
The mean vital sign parameters were assessed for changes and trends over the course of the study. Shifts from Baseline in vital sign parameters were assessed for clinical relevance.