Physiological Pacemaker Treatment in Combination With AV Node Ablation Compared With Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Patients With Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation - a Randomized Controlled Study
Overview
- Phase
- N/A
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Sponsor
- Region Skane
- Enrollment
- 45
- Locations
- 4
- Primary Endpoint
- Health related Quality of Life: questionnaire
- Status
- Terminated
- Last Updated
- last year
Overview
Brief Summary
Objective To investigate if conduction system pacing ((CSP) i.e. atrioventricular node ablation + His bundle pacing or Left Bundle Branch pacing) is as good as (or better than) atrial fibrillation ablation with pulmonary vein isolation for older patients (70-85yrs) with symptomatic atrial fibrillation and at least moderately dilated left atrium.
Patient population:
90 patients aged 70-85 years with atrial fibrillation, referred to either AV node ablation or pulmonary vein isolation.
Primary endpoint:
Improvement in health-related quality of life as measured by the physical component summary (PCS) of the well-validated SF-36 form, at one year after AV node ablation + CSP or AF ablation.
Secondary endpoints:
Physical performance measured by 6-minute walk test, biochemical markers of heart failure (NT-ProBNP), frequency of complications, left ventricular systolic and diastolic function, and left atrial size evaluated after 12 months. Arrhythmia specific symptoms and anxiety will be measured with the ASTA and HADS questionnaires. Arrhythmia symptom correlation between subjective and objective findings. After three years, clinical endpoints will be evaluated regarding overall survival, and risk of heart failure hospitalization or death. The cost of the treatments will be compared, and estimated cost per quality adjusted year of life will be calculated, based on the EQ5D questionnaire.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Indication for invasive treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation according to current guidelines
- •LVEF \>35%
- •Age 70-85 years
- •Persistent atrial fibrillation, or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with at least moderate enlargement of the left atrium (≥42ml/m2)
- •Chronic and well-tolerated treatment with anticoagulants (either non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant or vitamin K antagonist)
- •Willingness to participate, to understand the instructions and fill out the questionnaires, and ability to sign informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
- •Chronic atrial fibrillation with \>1 year duration
- •BMI \>40kg/m2
- •Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
- •Severe heart failure with symptoms ≥ NYHA class IIIb
- •Heart amyloidosis
- •Cardiac sarcoidosis
- •Recent (\<3 months) myocardial infarction
- •Significant heart valve disease (pronounced insufficiency or stenosis)
- •Pacemaker or ICD treatment ongoing, or current pacemaker indication
- •Congenital heart disease that required surgical correction
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Health related Quality of Life: questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 months
Improvement in the Physical Component Summary (PCS) of the SF-36 questionnaire
Secondary Outcomes
- Physical performance(12 months)
- Safety endpoint: Proportion of patients with major adverse events(12 months)
- Mental Quality of Life: questionnaire(12 months)
- Hospitalization for heart failure(3 years)
- Arrhythmia related Quality of Life: ASTA questionnaire(12 months)
- Anxiety and depression(12 months)
- Ejection fraction(12 months)
- Biomarker for heart failure(12 months)
- Health economy(12 months)
- Survival(3 years)
- Electrocardiography changes(12 months)