EXploring Patterns of Use and Effects of Adult Day Programs to Improve Trajectories of Continuing CarE (EXPEDITE)
Overview
- Phase
- N/A
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Not specified
- Sponsor
- York University
- Enrollment
- 500000
- Primary Endpoint
- Time to admission to a long-term care homes
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
- Last Updated
- last year
Overview
Brief Summary
This study seeks to understand the impact of Canada's adult day program on attendees and non-attendees, especially those with dementia and other co-morbidities. A retrospective cohort study will be conducted, including older adults in the community who do or do not attend adult day programs in Alberta, British Columbia, and Manitoba, Canada. The objectives are to (1) compare patterns of day program use (including non-use) by Canadian province (Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba), and time, (2) compare characteristics of older adults by day program use pattern (including non-use), province, and time, and (3) to examine whether those who are exposed to day programs, compared to a propensity-score matched comparison group of non-exposed older adults in the community, enter long-term care homes at later times (primary outcome), are less likely to have depressive symptoms, physical and cognitive change, and have lower use of primary, acute, and emergency care (secondary outcomes).
Detailed Description
Adult day programs provide critical supports to both, older adults living in the community, and their family/friend caregivers. This is essential because ensuring high-quality care in the community for as long as possible and avoiding or delaying long-term care home admissions are key priorities of older adults, their caregivers, and healthcare systems. While most older adults in Canada receive care in the community, about 10% of newly admitted nursing home residents have relatively low care needs that could be met in the community with the right supports. Caregivers provide most of the care in the community, which puts them at high risk for caregiver burden. Day programs intend to mitigate these issues by providing respite to caregivers. However, research on the effectiveness of day programs is inconsistent. Generally, the methodological quality of studies is poor, and especially Canadian research is lacking. The research objectives are to (1) explore changes in patterns of day program use (including non-use) between provinces and over time, (2) compare characteristics of older adults with different day program use patterns (including non-use), and (3) assess whether day program attendees compared to a propensity score matched control group of non-attendees have better outcomes. This retrospective cohort study will use population-based clinical and health administrative data of older adults (65+ years) who received publicly subsidized continuing care in the community in Alberta, British Columbia, and Manitoba between January 01, 2012 and December 31, 2024. Patterns of day program use (i.e., variations in time to attend a day program for the first time, and frequency and duration of attendance) and how these patterns vary by province and over time will be assessed. Characteristics of older adults with different patterns of day program use (e.g., no, low, medium, high) will be compared. Characteristics of the participants will include age, sex, dementia status, frailty level, comorbidity status, socioeconomic status, availability of a caregiver, and caregiver distress. Finally, propensity-matched comparison group (by region, age, gender, cognitive/physical impairment, type/duration of community care received previously) of older adults who have not attended a day program will be created. Time-to-event models and general estimating equations will assess whether day program attendees compared to non-attendees enter continuing care facilities later (primary outcome); use emergency, acute, or primary care less frequently; experience less cognitive and physical decline; and have better mental health (secondary outcomes). Models will include day program exposure as an independent variable and will be adjusted for province, participant demographics, medical and functional conditions, caregiver availability/distress, other community services received (e.g., home care, in-home respite), and (if appropriate) matching variables.
Investigators
Matthias Hoben
Associate Professor, Helen Carswell Chair in Dementia Care
York University
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Time to admission to a long-term care homes
Time Frame: From date of home care admission until the date of admission to a long-term care home or loss to follow up (i.e., death, move out of province), whichever came first, assessed up to 12 years (between Jan 31, 2012 and Dec 31, 2024)
Data will come from provincial continuing care registries, which document the start date of any publicly funded continuing care service a person receives, the end date of this service, and the type of service. The outcome will be the time between a person's first RAI-HC assessment and admission to a long-term care home (i.e., an assisted living home or nursing home).
Secondary Outcomes
- Presence or absence of physical decline(Baseline (date of home care admission) and annually until study end (Dec 31, 2024) or loss to follow up, whichever came first)
- Presence or absence of cognitive decline(Baseline (date of home care admission) and annually until study end (Dec 31, 2024) or loss to follow up, whichever came first)
- Symptoms of depression(Baseline (date of home care admission) and annually until study end (Dec 31, 2024) or loss to follow up, whichever came first)
- Emergency room registrations(Baseline (date of home care admission) and annually until study end (Dec 31, 2024) or loss to follow up, whichever came first)
- Primary care provider visits(Baseline (date of home care admission) and annually until study end (Dec 31, 2024) or loss to follow up, whichever came first)
- Hospital stays(Baseline (date of home care admission) and annually until study end (Dec 31, 2024) or loss to follow up, whichever came first)