CTRI/2019/09/021044尚未招募未知
Comparison of Airtraq and McGrath videolaryngoscope for endotracheal intubation in simulated cervical spine injury patients
试验速览
- 阶段
- 未知
- 状态
- 尚未招募
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
入选标准
- •ASA1and 2 patients aged 18-60 years of either sex undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation
排除标准
- •Mouth opening less than 2.5cm
- •Patient with any oral cavity pathology
- •Patient with cervical spine pathology
- •Pregnant patients
研究者
相似试验
尚未招募
4 期
Comparision of Airtraq TM video laryngoscope with Macintosh laryngoscope for emergency intubatioCTRI/2024/05/066825niversity College Of Medical Sciences
尚未招募
不适用
WHICH IS BETTER FOR TRACHEAL INTUBATION AIRTRAQ VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPE OR CONVENTIONAL MACINTOSH LARYNGOSCOPECTRI/2018/01/011446ninversity College of Medical Sciences
尚未招募
不适用
A study to compare two different types of video laryngoscopes (Airtraq optical laryngoscope and McGrath video laryngoscope) for intubation in childreCTRI/2021/07/034829Maulana Azad Medical College
招募中
不适用
Comparison of conventional laryngoscope with video laryngoscope.CTRI/2018/05/014150Gurleen Kaur
招募中
4 期
Comparison of Glidescope and McGrath video laryngoscope for intubating time by anesthetic residentsobesityelderlyhistory of GERDprobable difficult intubationairway pathologyc spine injuryobesity [a]elderly [b]history of GERD [c]probable difficult intubation [d]airway pathology [e]c spine injury [f]TCTR20160102001Prince of Songkhla university60