MedPath

Safety and Efficacy of Pirfenidone in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Interventions
Drug: Placebo
Registration Number
NCT00287729
Lead Sponsor
Genentech, Inc.
Brief Summary

The purposes of this study are to assess the efficacy of treatment with pirfenidone 2403 milligrams per day compared with placebo in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF)and to assess the safety of treatment with pirfenidone 2403 milligrams per day compared with placebo in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Detailed Description

This is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, safety and efficacy study of pirfenidone in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Approximately 320 patients at approximately 50 centers will be randomly assigned (1:1) to receive pirfenidone 2403 milligrams or placebo equivalent administered in divided doses three times per day (TID) with food. The primary outcome variable will be the absolute change in percent predicted Forced Vital Capacity from Baseline to Week 72. Patients will be randomized by geographic region.

Patients will receive blinded study treatment from the time of randomization until the last patient randomized has been treated for 72 weeks. A Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) will periodically review safety and efficacy data to ensure patient safety.

After week 72, patients who meet the Progression of Disease (POD) definition, which is a ≥ 10% absolute decrease in percent predicted Forced Vital Capacity or a ≥ 15% absolute decrease in percent predicted carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLco), will be eligible to receive permitted idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis therapies in addition to their blinded study drug. Permitted idiopathic pulmonary therapies include corticosteroids, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide and N-acetyl-cysteine (with restrictions).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
344
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
placeboPlaceboPlacebo equivalent.
2403 mg/day pirfenidonePirfenidone2403 mg/day pirfenidone dose group.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Absolute Change in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity(FVC)Baseline to week 72

Mean Change in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) as measured from baseline to week 72. It is calculated as the simple difference between baseline Percent Predicted FVC measurements and week 72 Percent Predicted FVC measurements.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Categorical Assessment of Absolute Change in Percent Predicted Forced Vital CapacityBaseline to week 72

Based on the change in baseline percent predicted FVC at week 72, patients were assigned to 1 of 5 categories: mild decline (\<10% but \>=0% decline), moderate decline (\<20% but \>=10% decline), severe decline (\>=20% decline), mild improvement (\>0% but \<10% improvement), or moderate improvement (\>=10% improvement). Those who died or had a lung transplant before Week 72 were included in the severe decline category. The results indicate the number of patients who experience Categorical Change in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity.

Progression-free SurvivalBaseline to Week 72

Progression is defined as the first occurrence of a 10% absolute decline from baseline in percent predicted Forced Vital Capacity, a 15% absolute decline from baseline in percent predicted hemoglobin(Hgb)-corrected carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLco), or, death.

Change in the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) DistanceBaseline to Week 72

The change from Baseline to week 72 in distance walked during the 6-Minute Walk Test. This measure was calculated as the simple difference between baseline distanced walked over 6 minutes and week 72 distance walked over 6 minutes as measured in meters (m).

Change in Worst Oxygen Saturation by Pulse Oximetry (SpO2) Measurement Observed During the 6-Minute Walk TestBaseline to Week 72

The change from baseline to week 72 in worst oxygen saturation during the 6-Minute Walk Test as measure by Pulse Oximetry (SpO2) Level. It is calculated as the simple difference between baseline SpO2 measurements and week 72 SpO2 measurements.

Change in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (Hb)-Corrected Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity (DLco) of the LungsBaseline to Week 72

The change from baseline to week 72 in Percent Predicted Hemoglobin (Hb)-Corrected Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity (DLco) of the Lungs. It is calculated as the simple difference between baseline DLco measurements and week 72 DLco measurements.

Change in Dyspnea ScoreBaseline to Week 72

The mean change from baseline to week 72 in Dyspnea score was measured by the University of San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (UCSD SOBQ). The SOBQ is used to assess shortness of breath with various activities of daily living (for example, brushing ones teeth or mowing the lawn). Patients rated the severity of their shortness of breath experienced on an average day during the past week on a 6 point scale (0 to 5),with 0= not at all breathless, 4= severely breathless and 5= Maximally or unable to do because of breathlessness.

Worsening of IPFTime to acute IPF exacerbation, IPF-related death, lung transplant or respiratory hospitalization, whichever comes first.

Worsening of IPF was defined by the occurrence of any of the following events:

Acute IPF exacerbation, IPF-related death, Lung transplantation, or Respiratory hospitalization.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

InterMune, Inc.

🇺🇸

Brisbane, California, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath