IRCT201203124224N19
Completed
Phase 2
Assessing and comparing of Midazolam/Propofol and Ketamin/Propofol intravenouses sedation in anxiety children for dental treatment
Vice chancellor for Research of Isfahan university of medical sciences0 sites32 target enrollmentTBD
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Dental Anxiety.
- Sponsor
- Vice chancellor for Research of Isfahan university of medical sciences
- Enrollment
- 32
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 8 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Inclusion Criteria: Children ages 6\-8? Uncooperative 1negetive in Frankel grading? No specific disease? ASA I? No need to extraction? Treatment needs only on left side of upper jaw? No contraindication of sedation.
- •Exclusion criteria: Emergency event during study? Dental treatment more than 45 minutes.
Exclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of the efficacy of 3 drug groups :Midazolam, Propofol , and Midazolam- Propofol in prevention of pruritis induced by anesthetic drug used for syrgerypruritus.Pruritus, unspecifiedIRCT201203059213N1Tehran University of Medical Sciences90
Completed
Phase 2
Comparison of midazolam – propofol versus midazolam – ketamin in sedative endoscopy in out patientsEndoscopy.IRCT20191201045566N1Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences78
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
Compare midazolam and propofol for prevention of emergence agitation in childreHealth Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: O- Medical and SurgicalCTRI/2024/03/064208ABVIMS DR RML HOSPITA
Recruiting
Not Applicable
comparison of various drugs used for sedation during surgery.CTRI/2016/08/007197Department of Anaesthesiolgy150
Completed
Not Applicable
A randomized trial of propofol versus midazolam of sedation during radio frequency ablation in patients with hepatocellular carcinomaHepatocellular carcinomaJPRN-UMIN000011443Chiba university hospital140