Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03573479
NCT03573479
Completed
Not Applicable

Early Rehabilitation in Critically Ill Children - The PICU Lliber8 Study

McMaster University2 sites in 1 country130 target enrollmentJanuary 3, 2019

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Delirium
Sponsor
McMaster University
Enrollment
130
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Perceptions about barriers and facilitators for implementation of the bundle
Status
Completed
Last Updated
5 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This is a pilot quality improvement implementation study that will measure the impact of a rehabilitation bundle implementation on the outcomes of interest. Advancements in the care provided in Pediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs) have led to fewer deaths in children. These improvements are unfortunately countered by the emergence of side effects of critical illness, known as PICU-acquired complications (PACs). Delirium, muscle weakness, drug dependency and withdrawal are increasingly common. PACs occur because children are often over-sedated and experience long periods of immobilization. PACs delay recovery, increase disability and worsen long-term function and quality-of-life. Although they are preventable, PACs are very common and frequently overlooked by clinicians. This study aims to "liberate"children from critical illness and improve their recovery and functioning after discharge, through an innovative rehabilitation bundle of 8 complementary steps (PICU Liber8) to reduce sedation, allow children to awaken and breathe comfortably, encourage early mobilization, and engage families in their child's care.

Detailed Description

This is a pilot quality improvement implementation study that will measure the impact of a rehabilitation bundle. The objectives are: 1. Primary - Implementation Objectives: to determine the feasibility and resources required to implement PICU Liber8 in 2 PICUs, evaluate strategies for successful bundle adoption. Co-Primary - Process Objectives: to determine the impact of PICU Liber8 on the process of care. 2. Secondary Efficacy: impact on PACs and patient reported outcomes The methods consist of a PICU Liber8 Bundle Implementation Plan (Pronovost's 4 E's Framework), and measurement of the impact of Implementation through Orchestrated Testing (OT). For successful adoption of the PICU Liber8 bundle, the following are necessary: 1. A context appropriate implementation framework. 2. An implementation team leader. 3. Inter-professional team engagement (i.e. RN, RT, MD, pharmacy, allied health and family). 4. Ability to customize PICU Liber8 to the needs of each site. We will use the Pronovost's implementation framework, which has been shown to facilitate successful bundle adoption and improve the quality of patient care in adult and pediatric ICUs.17-19 This framework has 4 phases: Engage, Educate, Execute and Evaluate.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
January 3, 2019
End Date
October 30, 2020
Last Updated
5 years ago
Study Type
Observational
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Karen Choong

Professor

McMaster University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Perceptions about barriers and facilitators for implementation of the bundle

Time Frame: 18 months

Qualitative (i.e., narrative) assessment, description, and comparison of the perceptions from key stakeholders (i.e., family members, patients, clinicians, administrative personnel, nurse team, etc.) between groups about perceived barriers and facilitators for the adequate bundle's implementation. This belongs to the acceptability outcome.

Completion rate of daily goals (compliance)

Time Frame: 18 months

The total number and percentage of daily goals completed from a pre-established daily goals checklist that assess compliance with the bundle. This is considered part of the feasibility outcomes group.

Performance of the bundle assessed with qualitative (i.e., narrative) description and comparison between groups.

Time Frame: 18 months

Evaluation of performance as narrative description and comparison between periods of study, about the impact of the bundle on the process of quality of care. This also is part of the feasibility outcomes group.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Length of stay(1 month)
  • Ventilator-free days at 30 days(1 month)
  • Incidence of morbidities(18 months)
  • 30-day mortality(18 months)
  • Risk measurement of psychological sequelae.(18 months)
  • Economic analysis(18 months)
  • Health related quality of life(18 months)
  • Parental stress(18 months)
  • Functionality(18 months)

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials