Comparison of ease of intubation between wire reinforced endotracheal tube and Blockbuster endotracheal tube while intubating through Blockbuster intubating LMA to conclude regarding which endotracheal tube has better success rate.
Phase 4
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/01/061100
- Lead Sponsor
- Vardhman Mahavir medical college and Safdarjung hospital
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Patients falling under American Society of Anaesthesiologists Grade I and II with Modified Mallampatti score I and II and weighing between 30 and 70 kgs
Exclusion Criteria
Patients with loose dentures
Patients with anticipated complications
Study & Design
- Study Type
- PMS
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the first attempt success rate of wire reinforced endotracheal tube and Blockbuster endotracheal tubeTimepoint: To compare the first attempt success rate of wire reinforced endotracheal tube and Blockbuster endotracheal tube and the time taken in seconds for successful intubation at baseline.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1.Number of attempts & overall success rate <br/ ><br>2.Maneuvers for intubation <br/ ><br>3.changes in vitals & post operative complicationsTimepoint: 1.time taken in seconds for intubation <br/ ><br>2.Vital recording for the first 5 minutes after intubation <br/ ><br>3.Post operative complications recorded for the first 8 hours after the procedure