Comparison of Three Laryngoscope Blades for Orotracheal Intubation in the Operating Room
Phase 4
Completed
- Conditions
- Intubation
- Interventions
- Device: metallic single use bladeDevice: plastic single use bladeDevice: metallic reusable blade
- Registration Number
- NCT00876967
- Lead Sponsor
- University Hospital, Caen
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determinate if there is a difference in performance provided by three laryngoscope blades: plastic single use, metallic single use and metallic reusable blades.
- Detailed Description
Primary outcome: success of intubation at the first attempt
Secondary outcomes: quality of laryngeal exposition (Cormack and Lehanne modify grade), duration to success intubation, Intubation difficult Scale and result of intubation procedure
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 1040
Inclusion Criteria
- patient age over 18 who need general anesthesia with orothracheal intubation
Exclusion Criteria
- patient age under 18 or major assist
- presence of upper airway malformation or abnormality
- cervical or facial trauma
- previous difficult intubation known
- no use of curare
- Body Mass Index over 30kg/m2 if crush induction use
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description 1 metallic single use blade metallic single use blade 2 plastic single use blade plastic single use blade 3 metallic reusable blade metallic reusable blade
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method success of intubation at the first attempt immediately
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method quality of laryngeal exposition (Cormack and Lehanne modify grade) immediately duration to success intubation immediately Intubation difficult Scale Immediately result of intubation procedure immediately
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University Hospital Caen
🇫🇷Caen, Basse-Normandie, France