MedPath

Comparison of Three Laryngoscope Blades for Orotracheal Intubation in the Operating Room

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Intubation
Interventions
Device: metallic single use blade
Device: plastic single use blade
Device: metallic reusable blade
Registration Number
NCT00876967
Lead Sponsor
University Hospital, Caen
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determinate if there is a difference in performance provided by three laryngoscope blades: plastic single use, metallic single use and metallic reusable blades.

Detailed Description

Primary outcome: success of intubation at the first attempt

Secondary outcomes: quality of laryngeal exposition (Cormack and Lehanne modify grade), duration to success intubation, Intubation difficult Scale and result of intubation procedure

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
1040
Inclusion Criteria
  • patient age over 18 who need general anesthesia with orothracheal intubation
Exclusion Criteria
  • patient age under 18 or major assist
  • presence of upper airway malformation or abnormality
  • cervical or facial trauma
  • previous difficult intubation known
  • no use of curare
  • Body Mass Index over 30kg/m2 if crush induction use

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
1metallic single use blademetallic single use blade
2plastic single use bladeplastic single use blade
3metallic reusable blademetallic reusable blade
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
success of intubation at the first attemptimmediately
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
quality of laryngeal exposition (Cormack and Lehanne modify grade)immediately
duration to success intubationimmediately
Intubation difficult ScaleImmediately
result of intubation procedureimmediately

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University Hospital Caen

🇫🇷

Caen, Basse-Normandie, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath