Nurse PIV Insertion Success With and Without Assistive Devices in Patients 0-12 Months of Age

Not Applicable

Terminated

• Conditions: PIV Catheter Insertion; Vein Visualization

• Registration Number: NCT01637987
• Lead Sponsor: University of Nebraska

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if the use of a vein identification assistive device increases nurse PIV insertion success within the first two attempts in children 0-12 months of age when compared to unassisted methods.

Detailed Description

Obtaining peripheral intravenous (PIV) access is a nearly universal procedure for medical management of the hospitalized pediatric patient. In children, PIV placement can often be difficult due to the inability to identify peripheral veins (Wilson, 2007). Many assistive devices have been used or promoted to improve vein visualization with the intention of increasing PIV insertion success. Limited research was found to support this assumption regarding nursing PIV insertion success in children. This study is a randomized, controlled trial to determine if the use of a vein identification assistive device increases nurse PIV insertion success within the first two attempts in children 0-12 months of age when compared to unassisted methods. Patients admitted to Children's Hospital \& Medical Center (CHMC) Emergency Department, 4th floor medical-surgical unit, or 5th floor medical-surgical/ Intermediate Care Unit, up to 12 months of age requiring non-emergent PIV placement as part of their medical plan of care will be eligible. Following consent subjects will be randomized into one of three vein identification method study groups (1) Wee Sight Transilluminator - a hand held light emitting device held adjacent to or under the patient's extremity to visualize the venous anatomy; (2) VeinViewer - uses near infrared light to view hemoglobin and projects an image of venous anatomy onto the skin; and (3) Unassisted Methods - traditional techniques of vein visualization and palpation. Based on study group assignment the nurse will use the appropriate vein identification method during the first two PIV insertion attempts. Evaluation of vein identification methods will be based on PIV insertion success or failure.

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2012-07-01
• Study First Submitted: 2012-07-06
• Study First Submitted QC: 2012-07-10
• Study First Posted: 2012-07-11
• Primary Completion: 2017-02-02
• Study Completion: 2017-02-02
• Status Verified: 2023-12
• Last Update Submitted: 2023-12-29
• Last Update Posted: 2024-01-03

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: TERMINATED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 104

Inclusion Criteria

• Admitted to Children's Hospital & Medical Center Emergency Department, 4th floor medical-surgical unit, or 5th floor medical-surgical/Intermediate Care Unit
• Require non-emergent PIV placement as part of medical plan of care
• Less than or equal to 12 month birth date

Exclusion Criteria

• Greater than 12 month birth date
• PIV not required
• PIV inserted by practitioner other than RN
• PIV inserted by RN not employed by study areas
• Ward of state
• Require emergent PIV placement
• Primary language is not English or Spanish

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Successful PIV insertion during first or second cannulation attempt.	Immediate upon completing first or second PIV insertion attempt	Success = Insertion of a 22 or 24-gauge catheter into a peripheral vein followed by the immediate ability to flush 1-2 ml normal saline without signs of venous infiltration (e.g., pain and swelling).; Failure = Inability to insert a 22 or 24-gauge catheter into a peripheral vein, or insertion of a catheter into a peripheral vein followed by the immediate inability to flush 1-2 ml normal saline or signs of infiltration upon flushing.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Children's Hospital and Medical Center; 🇺🇸 Omaha, Nebraska, United States