MedPath

Quantitatively-informed Socket Design Process

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Artificial Limbs
Interventions
Device: Trans-femoral prosthetic socket
Registration Number
NCT05041998
Lead Sponsor
University of Pittsburgh
Brief Summary

This study will investigate the effects of specific standardized modifications to trans-femoral prosthetic sockets in a randomized within-subject design. This is in preparation for a subsequently planned clinical trial to validate the findings by implementing them into a fitting method for individual sockets.

Detailed Description

Background: Lower limb amputees experience chronic health challenges such as residual limb skin problems, low back pain, and osteoarthritis. These problems are exacerbated by high physical activity levels and by poor prosthetic socket fit. Prosthetists believe that limiting residual femur and skin motion will improve force coupling and thereby address these problems. However, there are no data demonstrating how changes in socket design affect residual femur and skin motion, and, by extension, lead to improved patient-reported outcomes.

Objective/Hypothesis: Goal of this research is to improve the current socket design optimization process that involves trial and error and relies heavily on the prosthetist's experience and intuition by using a quantitatively informed optimization process. The hypothesis is that modifiable in-socket mechanics, i.e. residual femur motion, skin strain, and pressure within the socket, are related to socket design and patient outcomes, and can be estimated using readily available clinical measurements.

Specific Aims: First aim is to identify the key characteristics of in-socket mechanics that are related to physical function and patient-reported comfort and function. The second aim is to identify readily available clinical measurements that are associated with the in-socket mechanical characteristics that are related to outcomes. The purpose of this aim is to correlate our laboratory findings from Aim 1 with more conventional modalities for clinical assessment.

Research Strategy: Preliminary data demonstrates the feasibility of the proposed research plan and will progress to a pilot clinical trial. The two aims will involve 30 transfemoral amputees. A highspeed biplane radiography system is used to image the residual limb while participants walk on a dual-belt instrumented treadmill both in their current socket and in sockets with purposely altered volume, brim height, cross-sectional geometry, and stiffness. Three-dimensional (3D) skin motion within the socket will be determined by tracking the motion of 40 to 50 small metal beads placed in a grid pattern on the skin of the residual limb before donning the socket. Residual femur motion within the socket will be determined with submillimeter accuracy using a validated tracking process that matches subject-specific bone models obtained from CT to the biplane radiographs. Discrete in-socket pressure will be recorded at four locations using pressure sensing pads. Readily available clinical measurements will be collected as well, including gait analysis, foot loading patterns, ground reaction forces, residual limb tissue stiffness, and hip range of motion hip strength. Each participant will complete clinical questionnaires to qualitatively evaluate comfort, fit, and overall satisfaction after wearing each socket. The different socket modifications are intended to affect the in-socket mechanics of the residual limb, physical function and patient-reported outcomes (Aim 1). These relationships will be assessed using a generalized linear model. Correlation between the research grade measurements and accessible clinical measures (Aim 2) will be evaluated using bivariate correlation analyses. The information gained in Aims 1 and 2 will be used to develop a quantitatively-informed socket optimization process, wherein the clinical measurements associated with in-socket mechanics will be used to inform socket design optimizations.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
30
Inclusion Criteria
  • Transfemoral prosthesis user
  • 18-80 years of age
  • Body weight less than 125 kg
  • Able to walk unassisted on a treadmill
Exclusion Criteria
  • Pregnant females
  • Clinically diagnosed osteoporosis
  • Previous high exposure to radiation

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Unmodified Socket + 8 Socket Modifications in Random OrderTrans-femoral prosthetic socketThe sequence of the 9 different interventions (original socket and 8 versions derived from it) is randomized for each participant. The number of participants is smaller than the number of possible permutations. Therefore the enacted ordering is randomly selected from the pool of possible orderings. Participants walk for less than 10 minutes with every socket type while data is being collected.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Skin strain1 second

average and peak skin strain within each of four regions, expressed as a percentage of the gait cycle

Residual Femur motion1 second

medial-lateral and superior-inferior translation of the distal femur relative to the socket from late swing through midstance

Socket pressure20 seconds

measure peak pressure and area under the pressure versus time curve, expressed as a percentage of the gait cycle

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Gait symmetry20 seconds

average of the peak trunk lean, and the average peak hip flexion and extension, measured by motion capture system

Hip strength20 seconds

Manual muscle testing of hip flexors and extensors

Hip Range of Motion20 seconds

Manually measured using goniometer

Static displacement1 second

distance from the most distal point of the residual femur to the inside surface of the socket under weightbearing

Plantar pressure20 seconds

peak plantar pressure from foot strike to midstance

Tissue Stiffness3 seconds

Average tissue stiffness for four regions of the residual limb

Hip flexion/extension20 seconds

Based on markers at greater trochanters, knee, ankle and foot.

Trunk lean20 seconds

Body angles based on markers placed on the shoulders and spine

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Delatorre Orthotics & Prosthetics

🇺🇸

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

University of Pittsburgh

🇺🇸

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath