Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT07763743
NCT07763743RecruitingNot Applicable

A Comparative Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Flexible Ureteroscopy With Flexible Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy With Vacuum-Assisted Access Sheath for the Management of Renal Stones 1- 2.5 cm in Pediatric Age Group

Ain Shams University1 site in 1 country72 target enrollmentStarted: June 1, 2026Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Recruiting
Enrollment
72
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Management of pediatric renal stones

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are both effective treatment modalities for renal calculi measuring up to 2.5 cm in pediatric patients, demonstrating similar efficacy and complication profiles.

Suction has emerged as a potentially transformative adjunct in both percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and RIRS. Recent studies evaluating various suction mechanisms during RIRS and mini-PCNL have demonstrated multiple benefits, including reduced operative time, higher stone-free rates (SFR), decreased intrarenal pressure (IRP) and temperature, as well as enhanced intraoperative visualization.

Both FANS-UAS in RIRS and VAAS in Mini-PCNL have shown promising outcomes in the pediatric population. Taken together, these findings suggest that suction-assisted technologies whether in RIRS or Mini-PCNL enhance both efficacy and safety in pediatric stone management.

Detailed Description

In children, renal stones commonly result from congenital anatomical defects, metabolic abnormalities, or recurrent urinary tract infections. Consequently, urolithiasis is more frequent in this age group and often requires more than one surgical intervention for complete management.

Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are both effective treatment modalities for renal calculi measuring up to 2.5 cm in pediatric patients, demonstrating similar efficacy and complication profiles .

Currently, the majority of pediatric renal stones can be managed effectively using shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), or percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Surgical interventions such as open, laparoscopic, or robotic surgery are reserved for a minority of cases involving anatomical abnormalities. As spontaneous passage of residual fragments occurs in only 20-25% of cases, achieving complete stone clearance is essential to minimize the risk of recurrence and additional interventions.

Technological advancements in endourological instrumentation have primarily aimed at minimizing procedure-related morbidity, including blood loss, postoperative pain, and renal injury. Consequently, miniaturized endoscopes and reduced-caliber access tracts (11-20 Fr) were developed, leading to the emergence of Mini-PCNL techniques specifically adapted for the management of large renal stones in pediatric patients.

The use of retrograde surgical approaches has expanded the capability to treat larger renal stones, despite often resulting in extended operative times. Due to its favorable safety profile and reduced complication rates, RIRS has gained acceptance as a preferred option for managing larger stones in pediatric patients.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
1 Year to 14 Years (Child)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •- Renal stone burden 1- 2.5 cm confirmed by imaging (CT or ultrasound).

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Patients who refuse to participate in the study.
  • •Untreated Urinary tract infection (UTI) proved by urine culture and sensitivity.
  • •Uncorrected coagulopathy.
  • •Anatomical anomalies or ureteral stricture precluding either surgical approach.
  • •Previous surgical intervention on the same kidney.

Arms & Interventions

Group A(Flexible Ureteroscopy with Flexible Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath )

Active Comparator

About 36 pediatric patients suffering from Renal Stones 1- 2.5 cm will be treated by Flexible Ureteroscopy with Flexible Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath

Intervention: Flexible Ureteroscopy (Procedure)

Group B(Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with Vacuum-Assisted Access Sheath )

Active Comparator

About 36 pediatric patients suffering from Renal Stones 1- 2.5 cm will be treated by Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with Vacuum-Assisted Access Sheath

Intervention: Flexible Ureteroscopy (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Management of pediatric renal stones

Time Frame: 6 months

To compare stone-free rate (SFR) at 1 month after the procedure between RIRS using FURS-UAS and mini-PCNL using VASS in pediatric patients with renal stones 1-2.5 cm

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Mohamed Ramadan

Assistant Lecturer at Urology Department, Faculty of Medicine

Ain Shams University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials