Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06602401
NCT06602401
Completed
Not Applicable

Investigation of Functional Parameters: Relationships Between Bimanual Coordination, Proprioception, Manuel Dexterity, and Strength

Gazi University1 site in 1 country25 target enrollmentApril 12, 2023

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Grip
Sponsor
Gazi University
Enrollment
25
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
The Purdue Pegboard Test was used to assess bimanual coordination.
Status
Completed
Last Updated
last year

Overview

Brief Summary

The goal of this cross-sectional study is to investigate the relationships between grip/pinch strengths, wrist flexion-extension strengths, wrist proprioception, manual dexterity, and bimanual coordination in healthy volunteers. The hypotheses are:

H0: There is no relationship between grip/pinch strengths, wrist flexion-extension strengths, wrist proprioception, manual dexterity, and bimanual coordination.

H1: There is a relationship between grip/pinch strengths, wrist flexion-extension strengths, wrist proprioception, manual dexterity, and bimanual coordination.

Within the scope of the study, the participants' active joint position sense (AJPS) and flexion-extension strengths of the wrist were assessed using an isokinetic dynamometer. Additionally, grip strength, key pinch, tip pinch, and palmar pinch strengths were evaluated using a dynamometer. The Purdue Pegboard Test was used to assess manual dexterity and bimanual coordination.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
April 12, 2023
End Date
January 12, 2024
Last Updated
last year
Study Type
Observational
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Barış SEVEN

Ph.D. research assistant

Gazi University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • After providing detailed information about the research, individuals who agreed to participate were included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Individuals who had undergone surgery or trauma in the upper extremity, had fractures or acute orthopedic injuries, had a history of neuromuscular diseases or congenital anomalies, had skin infections, or other conditions that could affect the assessment within the past 6 months were excluded from the study.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

The Purdue Pegboard Test was used to assess bimanual coordination.

Time Frame: Participants will be evaluated only once.

In the Purdue Pegboard test, participants, seated in front of the test board, were asked to placed pins into the holes on both sides of the board simultaneously with both hands as many pins as possible within 30 seconds. The total number of pins placed was recorded as the score for bimanual coordination.

The Purdue Pegboard Test was used to assess manual dexterity.

Time Frame: Participants will be evaluated only once.

In the Purdue Pegboard test, participants, seated in front of the test board, were first asked to use their dominant hand to pick up pins from the dominant side and place them into the holes on the same side, from top to bottom. They were instructed to place as many pins as possible within 30 seconds. The number of pins placed was recorded as the score for dominant hand manual dexterity. The same test was then conducted for the nondominant side.

The active joint position sense was assessed using an isokinetic dynamometer.

Time Frame: Participants will be evaluated only once.

For the assessment of wrist proprioception, an isokinetic dynamometer with demonstrated reliability \[Cybex NORM®, Humac, CA, USA\] was used. Wrist proprioception was assessed by Active Joint Position Sense (AJPS) measurement. During the test, participants wore eye masks. For the AJPS assessment, the target angle was set at 30° extension, which is the functional position of the wrist. Participants were asked to actively move their wrist from the neutral position to the 30° extension and hold this position for 5 seconds. This trial was repeated three times. Participants were then asked to find the target angle three times. The amount of error between the target angle and the achieved angle was used to define the accuracy of the active joint position sense. The arithmetic mean of these three measurements was calculated and recorded.

The flexion-extension strengths of the wrist were assessed using an isokinetic dynamometer.

Time Frame: Participants will be evaluated only once.

Wrist flexion and extension strengths were also evaluated using the Cybex isokinetic dynamometer. These strength assessments were conducted in the same position and range of motion as the proprioception evaluations. Before starting the measurements, participants were informed about the test. At the beginning of the test, three practice trials were performed. The concentric-concentric strength measurement was conducted with an angular velocity of 60°/s for 5 repetitions. A 20-second rest period was allowed between the practice and test trials. The peak torque parameters for wrist flexion and extension in both wrists were measured. Assessments began with the dominant side. Subsequently, the same measurements were repeated on the other extremity by adjusting the position of the dynamometer and chair. The device was calibrated before the participants were evaluated. All measurements were conducted by the same person to prevent inter-rater variability.

Grip and pinch strengths were measured using a digital dynamometer.

Time Frame: Participants will be evaluated only once.

The assessment of gross grip strength was performed using a digital dynamometer (J-Tech Commender Grip Track). Measurements were taken with the participant seated, the elbow flexed at 90 degrees, the wrist in up to 30 degrees of extension, and the forearm in a neutral rotation position. The dynamometer's grip width was set to the second level. Maximum grip force was measured by having the participant squeeze as hard as possible three times, and the arithmetic mean of these three measurements was calculated. Key pinch, palmar pinch, and tip pinch strength measurements were conducted using a pinch gauge (Baseline Mechanical Pinch Gauge, 60 lb) in the same position and with the same measurement technique as the gross grip strength assessment. All evaluation protocols were established according to the recommendations of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials