What Patients Really Want - Patient Preferences Regarding Annual Follow-up After Medical Interventions: The PAPAYA Study
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 2,566
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Assessment of preferred approach for annual follow-up after PCI
研究概览
简要总结
The purpose of this study is to determine the preference of patients regarding the approach for follow-up after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures. We hypothesize that patients prefer questionnaires for annual follow-up assessment when compared to telephone or email.
详细描述
Rationale: Assessment and reporting of long-term clinical follow-up after medical interventions is essential for transparency of medical care and its quality improvement. However follow-up adherence is a serious challenge in clinical trials. Taking the patient preference of the mode of follow-up into account is likely to enhance trial adherence, reduce withdrawals, and facilitate a longer follow-up duration. No data on patient preference of annual follow-up have been reported.
Objective: To investigate the patient preference of approach to obtain follow-up information after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
Study design: Single-center, prospective, observational registry
Study population: All patients enrolled in the percutaneous coronary intervention studies TWENTE trial (a broad study population reflecting real-world PCI patients) and DUTCH PEERS trial (an all-comers population), who were treated at Thoraxcentrum Twente in Enschede between June 2008 and May 2012
Intervention: All subjects will receive a questionnaire with questions regarding their preference with regards to the approach of acquiring follow-up information after PCI.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •All patients enrolled in the TWENTE trial and DUTCH PEERS trial (an all-comers population, who were treated at Thoraxcentrum Twente in Enschede between June 2008 and May 2012
排除标准
- •Patients who had withdrawn their consent for participation in the TWENTE and DUTCH PEERS trials, respectively. Patients who passed away during follow-up could obviously not be approached for further questioning.
结局指标
主要结局
Assessment of preferred approach for annual follow-up after PCI
时间窗: 1 year
次要结局
- Least preferred approach for follow up(1 year)
- Maximum acceptable number of questions to be answered(1 year)
研究者
Clemens von Birgelen
Professor
Thorax Centrum Twente