临床试验/NCT01932359

NCT01932359已完成不适用

Rapidly Absorbable Versus Non-absorbable Sutures for Mohs Surgery Repair on the Face: a Randomized Controlled Split-scar Study (RAVNAS)

University of British Columbia2 个研究点分布在 1 个国家目标入组 105 人开始时间: 2013年10月最近更新: 2015年4月13日

适应症

试验速览

阶段: 不适用
状态: 已完成
发起方: University of British Columbia
入组人数: 105
试验地点: 2
主要终点: Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES) score

研究概览研究设计入排标准结局指标研究者研究点记录与标识符相似试验

研究概览

简要总结

This study aims to compare scar outcomes between rapidly absorbable and non-absorbable sutures (stitches) for the closure of wounds after skin cancer removal on the face.

研究设计

研究类型: Interventional
分配方式: Randomized
干预模型: Parallel
主要目的: Treatment
盲法: Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围: 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
性别: All
接受健康志愿者: 否

入选标准

•Mohs surgical wound on the face
•Wound greater than or equal to 4 cm in length
•Subject is willing and capable of cooperating to the extent and degree required by the protocol and will be able to come for follow-up assessments
•Subject has read and signed Subject Information and Informed Consent Form

排除标准

•Surgical wound less than 4 cm in length
•Surgical site outside of face
•Subject to be be treated with radiation therapy after surgery
•Subject is not willing or able to attend for follow-up assessments

结局指标

主要结局

Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES) score

时间窗: 6 months

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方

University of British Columbia

申办方类型

Other

责任方

Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Unknown

早期 1 期

Comparison of Fast-Absorbing Sutures for Mohs SurgeryCicatrix

NCT02334917University of British Columbia100

进行中（未招募）

不适用

Comparison of sutures for the repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptureInjury, poisoning and certain other consequences of external causes

KCT0006596Koera University Guro Hospital40

尚未招募

4 期

Comparison of absorbable or permanent sutures for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: A randomized, prospective studypelvic organ prolapse

JPRN-UMIN000053250Hokusuikai-Kinen hospital184

Unknown

不适用

Nonabsorbable Versus Absorbable Sutures for Anterior ColporrhaphyPelvic Organ Prolapse

NCT03736811Seoul National University Hospital196

已完成

不适用

se of absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for vaginal implant fixation during sacrocolpopexy as part of the surgical treatment of vaginal vault prolapse ICS-POPQ stage II-IIIN99.3N94.1Prolapse of vaginal vault after hysterectomyDyspareunia

DRKS00003263niversitäts-Frauenklinik208