跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02715739
NCT02715739已完成不适用

Is There a Difference in the Mortality Prediction Performance of Two ICISS Approaches for Trauma Patients Admitted to Hospitals in Urban India?

Karolinska Institutet0 个研究点目标入组 3,921 人开始时间: 2016年1月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
3,921
主要终点
Mortality

研究概览

简要总结

This study aims to compare the predictive performance of two different approaches of the international classification of disease injury severity score (ICISS) using data from four public university hospitals in urban India.

详细描述

Research question Is there a difference in the mortality prediction performance of two ICISS approaches for trauma patients admitted to hospitals in urban India?

Study design The investigators will conduct a retrospective registry based study.

Setting The data that will be used is from a prospective cohort study named towards improved trauma care outcomes in India (TITCO). It was collected from four public university hospitals in India between October 2013 and January 2015. The hospitals are in Mumbai, Delhi and Kolkata. The two centers in Mumbai were King Edward Memorial Hospital and Lokmanya Tilak Municipal General Hospital. The one in Delhi was Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Center and the one in Kolkata was the Institute of Post-Graduate Medical Education and Research and Seth Sukhlal Karnani Memorial Hospital.

The data was collected by one trained project officer at each hospital, working eight-hour shifts with a rotating schedule between day, evening and night shifts. Data from patients admitted outside of the shift hours was collected retrospectively within days of arrival to hospital. The patients were followed until discharge, death or to a maximum of 30 days. If discharged, the patients were considered to be alive at 30 days. There was no follow-up after patient discharge or after the 30 days.

Source and method of participant selection Project officers included consecutive patients that presented to participating hospitals. Patients were included either by direct observation during the project officers' shifts or by retrospective data extraction from patient records.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Retrospective

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Mortality

时间窗: Within 30 days of patient arrival to participating centre

次要结局

  • Mortality(Within 24 hours of patient arrival to participating centre)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Martin Gerdin

Researcher

Karolinska Institutet

相似试验

招募中
2 期
Comparison of the evolution of the effect of the two methods of prescribing the mature substance to the lungs of premature infants: Delicate endotracheal catheter during spontaneous respiration with intratracheal intubation in infants at two years of ageRespiratory distress syndrome of newborn.Respiratory distress syndrome of newbornP22.0
IRCT20110807007244N8Mashhad University of Medical Sciences148
尚未招募
不适用
Assessment Of Different Scores In Predicting Outcome In AECOPD Patients In Emergency DepartmentChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
NCT05793697Assiut University139
进行中(未招募)
不适用
Estudio comparativo de dos métodos para predecir el uso de co-receptores por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia 1 (HIV-1): el ensayo fenotípico (Trofile ESTA®) y la respuesta virológica a corto plazo a un antagonista de CCR5.Infección por el Virus de la Inmunodeficiencia Humana tipo-1 (VIH-1).El antirretroviral maraviroc pertenece a un grupo de medicamentos llamados antagonistas del CCR5 e impide la entrada del VIH-1 en las células sanguíneas, bloqueando el receptor CCR5 que el VIH utiliza para poder entrar en estas células.
EUCTR2008-007208-28-ESAsociación para el Estudio de las Enfermedades Infecciosas
招募中
Unknown
Continuous infusion VS Intermittent bolus method of Epidural infusion method to improve postoperative analgesia
CTRI/2024/07/070716AIIMS Bibinagar
已完成
不适用
Comparing NISS and ISS for Mortality Prediction in Trauma PatientsTrauma
NCT06705959Al-Nahrain University458
Is There a Difference in the Mortality Prediction... | 临床试验