跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04886115
NCT04886115Unknown不适用

Effects of Eccentric Pedaling at Different Rates on Neuromuscular Function

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 35 人开始时间: 2022年2月7日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
35
试验地点
1
主要终点
Maximum isometric force developed in the quadriceps

研究概览

简要总结

The recent appearance of ergocycles that can be used for eccentric pedaling (Cyclus type) has aroused a growing interest in the field of rehabilitation. The mechanical, metabolic, and cardiorespiratory characteristics of eccentric exercises make them an exercise of choice when the goal is to improve locomotor muscle function and exercise capacity. Despite its potential advantages, the optimal modalities of eccentric pedaling, in particular the choice of pedaling frequency, are still poorly understood, especially its effects on the neuromuscular system. Indeed, most training protocols impose a fixed pedaling power but with highly variable pedaling rates, ranging from 15 to 60 rpm (Besson et al., 2013; MacMillan et al., 2017). For a given pedaling power level (P), the choice of pedaling frequency (F) directly impacts the force torque (C) and thus the force applied to the pedals, since power is equal to the product of pedaling frequency and force torque (P = F.C). For frequencies varying from 15 to 60 rpm, the level of muscular tension during pedaling therefore varies from single to quadruple. These very large variations in force can influence the neuromuscular adaptations induced during a prolonged training period. For example, the use of low pedaling frequencies corresponding to high muscle tension could favor peripheral muscular adaptations (e.g. contractility) whereas higher pedaling frequencies could favor central (i.e. nervous) adaptations.

A better understanding of the neuromuscular adaptations induced by a period of eccentric pedaling at different cadences will allow for a more precise definition of training protocols for populations likely to undergo this type of training (e.g. elderly people, patients with heart failure).

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 40 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
是

入选标准

  • •Person who has given oral consent
  • •Subject capable of understanding simple commands and giving consent
  • •Subject (male or female) between 18 and 40 years of age.
  • •Subject able to do moderate physical activity

排除标准

  • •Person not affiliated to national health insurance.
  • •Physical disabilities affecting the lower limbs or the pelvis, and which may hinder or prevent the practice of exercise on an ergocycle, whether neurological (central or peripheral), arterial (in particular, arterial disease of the lower limbs with a systolic index < 0.6) or orthopedic (degenerative or inflammatory rheumatism).
  • •Person under legal protection (curatorship, guardianship)
  • •Person under court order (sauvegarde de justice)
  • •Pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding women
  • •Major unable to express consent

研究组 & 干预措施

Eccentric pedalling group at 60 rpm

Experimental

干预措施: Neuromuscular evaluation (Other)

Eccentric pedalling group at 60 rpm

Experimental

干预措施: Assessment of aerobic capacity, muscle architecture and habituation to the eccentric pedaling task (Other)

Eccentric pedalling group at 60 rpm

Experimental

干预措施: Pedaling at 60rpm (Other)

Control

Active Comparator

干预措施: Neuromuscular evaluation (Other)

Control

Active Comparator

干预措施: Assessment of aerobic capacity, muscle architecture and habituation to the eccentric pedaling task (Other)

Control

Active Comparator

干预措施: No pedaling, usual activity (Other)

Eccentric pedalling group at 15 rpm

Experimental

干预措施: Neuromuscular evaluation (Other)

Eccentric pedalling group at 15 rpm

Experimental

干预措施: Assessment of aerobic capacity, muscle architecture and habituation to the eccentric pedaling task (Other)

Eccentric pedalling group at 15 rpm

Experimental

干预措施: Pedaling at 15 rpm (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Maximum isometric force developed in the quadriceps

时间窗: 6 weeks of training

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验