跳至主要内容
临床试验/ACTRN12616001298404
ACTRN12616001298404已完成未知

Randomized Comparative Study of CMAC D blade versus Glidescope in Simulated Difficult intubations, Using manual inline cervical stabilization on patients with no difficult airway predictors

SHAHID ADEE0 个研究点目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2016年9月15日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
未知
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
60

研究概览

简要总结

Our study revealed that Glidescope slightly outperforms the CMAC- D blade in terms of zero IDS. However, there is no clinical significance or statistical significance if we compare IDS score altogether

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomised controlled trial
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Blinded (masking used)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Patients undergoing elective surgery that require general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation.
  • No predictors for difficult airway: as defined by
  • Mouth opening more than 4 cms,
  • Thyromental distance > 6 cms.
  • Malampati grade 1 and 2.
  • No documented evidence of difficult airway

排除标准

  • Trauma patients
  • Emergency surgery
  • Any clinical predictors of difficult airway
  • Burns patients.
  • Bronchial asthma, COPD, bronchiectasis
  • Recent history of chest infection < 4 weeks
  • Thoracic cage anatomical deformity.

研究者

发起方
SHAHID ADEE

相似试验