An Individualized Approach to Promote Nurturing Care in Low and Middle Income Countries: A Hybrid Effectiveness/Implementation Trial of the International Guide for Monitoring Child Development
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 进行中(未招募)
- 入组人数
- 624
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Change in Composite Motor Score at 12 months
研究概览
简要总结
The aim of this study is to conduct a hybrid effectiveness/implementation assessment of the International Guide for Monitoring Child Development (GMCD) in two LMIC settings, India and Guatemala, within established rural CHW programs. The primary objectives are (a) to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of the GMCD; (b) to use an implementation science framework to understand barriers and facilitators to effective population coverage, provider implementation, and maintenance; (c) to conduct an economic evaluation of the GMCD.
详细描述
Specific Aim 1: Assess the effectiveness of the GMCD intervention to improve developmental outcomes and nurturing care in India and Guatemala. The investigators will conduct a parallel-arm cluster randomized trial within rural CHW programs. In the primary effectiveness phase, children under 2 years old will receive the GMCD intervention or control for 12 months. Subsequently, control clusters will cross into the intervention, and continue an additional 12 months (total 24 study months). The primary developmental effectiveness outcome will be change in age-adjusted scores at 12 months on the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, 4th Edition BSID4) (3). The secondary nurturing care effectiveness outcome will be change in mean Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME) score at 12 months (4).
Specific Aim 2: Assess barriers and facilitators to GMCD implementation using the RE-AIM evaluation framework (5). RE-AIM domains will be assessed as: (a) Reach: participation rates, comparison of participant/non-participant characteristics, attendance/drop-out; (b) Effectiveness: impact on development (BSID4) and nurturing environment (HOME) [in Aim 1]; (c) Adoption: proportion of workers/facilities participating, CHW characteristics; (d) Implementation: contact hours/visit completion, fidelity to delivery protocols; (e) Maintenance: patient outcomes and cost effectiveness analysis at 12-24 months [in Aim 3]; intent by decision makers and implementers to continue intervention. In addition, the investigators will conduct a sequential quantitative-->qualitative explanatory analysis, using interviews and focus groups with implementers from clusters with highest/lowest impact outcomes (BSID4/HOME) to explore institutional inner and outer setting and implementation processes associated with intervention success, using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).
Specific Aim 3: Conduct an economic evaluation of the GMCD intervention. Evaluation will assess (a) costs of the interventions at 12 and 24 months; and (b) cost-effectiveness of the intervention (dollar per unit increase in BSID or HOME scores) at 12 months. This analysis will provide cost information to policymakers to help guide resource allocation decisions for ECD interventions.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Prevention
- 盲法
- None
盲法说明
Given nature of study, blinding is not feasible.
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 0 Months 至 24 Months(Child)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •age 0-24 months at the time of enrollment visit
- •receiving health services from frontline health workers of Maya Health Alliance (Guatemala), Mahatma Gandhi Institute (India) or their local partners
排除标准
- •children who are critically ill and are judged by the frontline health worker to require hospitalization or center-based care
- •children whose caregivers do not provide informed consent for the study
研究组 & 干预措施
Intervention arm
Subjects from intervention clusters will receive the GMCD intervention, delivered in monthly visits to the home by frontline health workers, for 24 months. 0-12 months represents the primary effectiveness study, and 12-24 months a secondary maintenance study.
干预措施: International Guide for Monitoring Child Development (Behavioral)
Control Arm
Subjects in control clusters will continue to receive usual care from their frontline health workers. After 12 months (primary effectiveness study) control will cross into the intervention for months 12-24.
结局指标
主要结局
Change in Composite Motor Score at 12 months
时间窗: Change from 0 to 12 months
Using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, 4th Edition (BSID4), higher scores better, scale range 46-154
Change in Composite Cognitive Score at 12 months
时间窗: Change from 0 to 12 months
Using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, 4th Edition (BSID4), higher scores better, scale range 55-145
Change in Composite Language Score at 12 months
时间窗: Change from 0 to 12 months
Using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, 4th Edition (BSID4), higher scores better, scale range 47-153
次要结局
- Change in the Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment Scale (HOME) Raw Score(Change from 0 to 12 months)
研究者
Peter J. Rohloff, M.D.,Ph.D.
Assistant Professor/Associate Physician
Brigham and Women's Hospital
