IRCT20110908007513N17招募中3 期
Comparative study between three methods of ovulation stimulation, conventional, mild stimulation and combining the stop GnRH agonist with letrozole priming in outcome of poor responders in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART)
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 3 期
- 状态
- 招募中
- 入组人数
- 150
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 30 years 至 43 years（—）
- 性别
- Female
入选标准
- •Individuals with poor ovarian response in the ovulation stimulation cycle are characterized by the POSEIDON criterion. Groups 3 and 4 are entered.The third group of patients are under 35 years with abnormal ovarian reserve test AFC (number of antral follicles) less than 5 and antimullerian hormone less than 1.2 ng / cc. The fourth group of patients are over 35 years with abnormal ovarian reserve test AFC less than 5 And antimullerian hormone less than 1.2 ng / cc
排除标准
- •Patients who are infected with the coronavirus during the cycle, patients who do not respond well to the ovulation stimulation cycle and do not actually have a follicle to empty, patients who received drug incorrectly during the cycle.
研究者
相似试验
已完成
不适用
Mild and minimal ovarian stimulation in patients with polycystic ovarian syndromeIRCT20080831001141N30ROYAN Institute120
已完成
4 期
Comparison of ART Outcomes between Two Protocols of Induction of ovulation in Patients with Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism•Female infertility associated with anovulation.HypopituitarismIRCT201312251141N16Royan Institute90
进行中（未招募）
1 期
Controlled ovarian stimulation with highly purified menotropin in low-responder patients.EUCTR2016-001590-32-ESManuel Macía Cortiñas64
招募中
3 期
Comparison of long protocol with ovulation stimulation protocol in frozen embryo transfer cycle in women with polycystic ovarian syndromeIRCT20120215009014N434Hamedan University of Medical Sciences340
已完成
3 期
Double ovarian stimulation (Shanghai and Duostim protocol)IRCT20080831001141N35Royan Institute100