Evaluate the Impact of Online Educational Material (PRONEtect Educational Hub) on Nursing Students' Knowledge, Confidence Levels, and Application of Knowledge Regarding Skin Protection of the Prone Ventilated Patient - a Randomised Controlled Study
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 80
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Knowledge assessment (test score)
研究概览
简要总结
The goal of this randomised controlled trial is to compare the impact of online educational material versus a classic lecture on the confidence levels, knowledge and knowledge application of final-year nursing students.
Participants will be asked to complete a baseline self-efficacy evaluation and a baseline knowledge test which were validated by the 11-member international expert panel previously established.
After randomization, the control group will be asked to attend a classic 1-hour lecture at the nursing school about the topic of prone positioning and skin/tissue damage prevention.
The experimental group will get access to the PRONEtect educational website containing short simulation videos and other learning materials.
Three weeks later the participants will be asked to complete the self-efficacy evaluation and knowledge assessment again, additionally a knowledge application assessment.
All the questionnaires will be administered via Qualtrics.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Other
- 盲法
- Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
盲法说明
The lecturers at the nursing schools (x2) will have no access to the results of the surveys. A study number is assigned to the students and with the study number they enter their answers to the questionnaires
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Final year nursing students studying towards their Bachelor in Nursing degree
- •Chosen topics of critical care nursing as supplementary subject or critical care subjects as part of their course or complex wound management as part of their course.
排除标准
- •Nursing students who are not yet in their final year of studies.
结局指标
主要结局
Knowledge assessment (test score)
时间窗: 3 weeks
A total sample size of 78 participants (39 in each group, 1:1 allocation ratio) to have at least 80% power to demonstrate non-inferiority of the online package (experimental group) compared to the classical lecture (control group) with respect to the mean change from baseline in knowledge at week 3 at the one-sided 1.25% significance level, when the non-inferiority margin is set at 1 point and when we assume a common standard deviation in both groups of 2.5 points, a true difference between the groups of 1 point in favor of the online package, and a drop-out rate of 20%.
次要结局
- Confidence levels (survey scores)(3 weeks)
- Difference between the "Knowledge application" (test score) between the groups(3 weeks)