跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05544838
NCT05544838已完成不适用

Simulation Based Comparison Of Standard Versus Rotational Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion Technique In Novice Anesthesiologists. A Randomised Control Crossover Trial

Aga Khan University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 13 人开始时间: 2021年10月2日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
13
试验地点
2
主要终点
The ease of LMA insertion was measured on the basis of number of LMA insertion attempts.

研究概览

简要总结

The primary objective of study was to compare insertion ease by standard and rotational LMA insertion technique on basis of LMA insertion attempts and insertion time duration. The secondary objective of study was to analyse impact of prior information for airway device, insertion techniques, general or specific work experience in airway management with ease of both insertion techniques. And, tertiary objective of study was to analyse the trainee's preference insertion technique on basis of learning method and practical adaptability.

Hypothesis:

The rotational LMA insertion technique is easy to understand and practice than the standard LMA insertion technique at the beginning of airway management training among the novice anesthesiologists.

Hypothesis:

The rotational LMA insertion technique is easy to understand and practice than the standard LMA insertion technique at the beginning of airway management training among the novice anesthesiologists.

详细描述

  • LMA insertion attempts are the number of LMA insertion attempts with each study's insertion technique. The 10 insertion attempts will be performed with each insertion technique by trainees.
  • LMA insertion time duration is the time taken to complete LMA insertion; from the holding of device till the confirmation of chest movement (artificial lungs inflation in manikin).
  • The correlation of previous information for airway device, insertion techniques, general or specific work experience in airway management with the ease of both study's insertion techniques will be asked by participant's through the questionnaire at the start of study.
  • The trainees will be asked at the end of study for preferred insertion method at novice level on the basis of learning method and practical conduct (user friendly)

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
None

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • First year anaesthesia trainee
  • Using adult mannequin

排除标准

  • Paediatric mannequin
  • Participant's refusal

结局指标

主要结局

The ease of LMA insertion was measured on the basis of number of LMA insertion attempts.

时间窗: 5 minute

Ease of LMA insertion in mannequin mouth was measured by performing the 10 times insertion of LMA with both study techniques in mannequin mouth by trainees.

The ease of LMA insertion was measured on the basis of final LMA insertion time taken duration.

时间窗: 5 minutes

The total time duration of final LMA insertion confirmation in mannequin mouth was recorded. The time duration counting was started from LMA holding in operator's hand to the confirmed successful insertion in mannequin mouth.

次要结局

  • The trainee's baseline knowledge was assessed for the type LMA insertion techniques.(1 minute)
  • The trainee's baseline knowledge was assessed for the general or specific work experience in airway management using the LMA.(1 minute)
  • The trainee's baseline knowledge was assessed for the studied Rotational LMA insertion technique.(2 minutes)
  • The trainee's baseline knowledge was assessed for the type of supraglottic airway devices and LMA insertion techniques.(1 minute)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dileep Kumar

Assistant Professor

Aga Khan University

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Simulated Comparison of Standard Versus Rotational... | 临床试验