跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04436211
NCT04436211Unknown不适用

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Patient Specific Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Kinematic Alignment Versus Ligament-balanced, Mechanical Alignment

Medical University of Graz1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2020年2月15日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
发起方
入组人数
100
试验地点
1
主要终点
Change of Pain after kinematic vs mechanical aligned TKA

研究概览

简要总结

A promising new approach in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for severe osteoarthritis of the knee joint is the the kinematic aligned procedure (KA). This technique provides prosthesis-positioning based on natural and individual axes of movement.

Although first series have shown satisfying results, further verification by prospective studies and final meta-analyses will be required.

Thus, the kinematic alignment represents one of the few new developments in TKA.

Provided that patients are willing to participate in the study, patients data are collected preoperatively and during routine follow-up examinations and evaluated prospectively. Patients will receive either a conventionally mechanical aligned arthroplasty or a kinematical aligned TKA, according to a randomized procedure.

The kinematic alignment will be achieved by the use of custom-made cutting-blocks. Therefore, the patients will undergo a computed tomography of the whole leg on the affected side. This is mandatory in order to provide the individually produced cutting blocks.

In order to ensure comparability, patients are stratified regarding their age and gender before inclusion.

Outcome will be measured by the use of standard scoring systems regarding function, pain and ROM (range of motion) three, six and 12 months after surgery.

This study is a monocentric, prospective, randomized and controlled open study.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Control
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
50 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Severe osteoarthritis of the knee joint, intended for total knee arthroplasty

排除标准

  • malalignment with varus of more than 5° or valgus malpositioning, joint instability

结局指标

主要结局

Change of Pain after kinematic vs mechanical aligned TKA

时间窗: 3; 6; 12 months

The pain will be measured with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 1 to 10. 1 is meaning no pain, 10 is meaning the worst pain imaginable.

Change of Function after kinematic vs mechanical aligned TKA (KSS)

时间窗: 3; 6; 12 months

Function of the artificial joint will be assessed by the use of the Combined Knee Society Score (KSS). The KSS has a "Knee Score" section (7 items) and a "Functional Score" section (3 items). Both sections are scored from 0 to 100 with lower scores being indicative of worse knee conditions and higher scores being indicative of better knee conditions.

Change of Function after kinematic vs mechanical aligned TKA (WOMAC)

时间窗: 3; 6; 12 months

Function of the artificial joint will be assessed by the use of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index Score (WOMAC). The WOMAC survey is comprised of 24 items divided into three subscales: Pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items), and physical function (17 items). Patients are asked a range of questions about their ability to carry out daily activities such as using the stairs, rising from sitting, lying in bed and conducting light or heavy domestic duties. All the items are scored on a scale of 0-4 (lower scores indicate lower levels of symptoms or physical disability). Values are summed up for a combined WOMAC score.

Change of Range of Motion (ROM) after kinematic vs mechanical aligned TKA

时间窗: 3; 6; 12 months

To assess range of motion a Standard Goniometer will be used. Measurements will be obtained after 3, 6, 12 months

Change of Function after kinematic vs mechanical aligned TKA (OKS)

时间窗: 3; 6; 12 months

Function of the artificial joint will be assessed by the use of the Oxford Knee Score (OKS). The OKS is a patient reported outcome measure that consists of 12 questions about an individual's activities of daily living and how they have been affected by pain after total knee arthroplasty. All questions are scored from 0-4 where four is the best outcome and total scores range from 0 (worst outcome) to 48 (best outcome).

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Medical University of Graz
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验