A Comparison of Medial Cervical Plexus Block Versus Combined (Superficial and Deep) Cervical Plexus Block for Carotid Endarterectomy: A Prospective, Randomized Single Blind Study
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 100
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Complications
研究概览
简要总结
The purpose of the study is to compare efficacy, complications and safety of the standard method of Combined (superficial and deep) cervical plexus block (SDCPB) with Ultrasound guided Medial Cervical plexus block technique (MCPB).
Hypothesis: Ultrasound assisted MCPB is safer than SDCPB with similar efficacy.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Supportive Care
- 盲法
- Single (Participant)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 30 Years 至 90 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Patients undergoing Elective Carotid Endarterectomy
排除标准
- •Denied consent to block performance, Emergency procedure
结局指标
主要结局
Complications
时间窗: perioperative
number of additional applications of short-acting local anaesthetic
时间窗: intraoperatively
The number of times a surgeon would have to supplement the Regional Block with intrafield application of increments of short-acting local anaesthetic
patient satisfaction
时间窗: 24 h after operation
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Daniel Nalos MD
Prim Daniel Nalos, MUDr., Head of Dept., Anaesthesiology and Critical Care
Masaryk Hospital Krajská zdravotní a.s.