NCT06353815尚未招募不适用
Clinical Evaluation of Anaesthetic Efficacy of 4% Articaine Buccal Infiltration Versus Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block for Restorative Dental Treatment in Mandibular First Permanent Molars: A Randomized Clinical Tria
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 入组人数
- 44
- 主要终点
- Success of local anesthesia
研究概览
简要总结
Clinical evaluation of anaesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine buccal infiltration versus inferior alveolar nerve block during restorative dental treatment in mandibular first permanent molars
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Other
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 6 Years 至 9 Years（Child）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Clinical Criteria:
- •Children aged between 6 years and 9 years having:
- •Mandibular first permanent molar with simple caries not involving pulp showing the following criteria: A. No history of spontaneous pain, pathologic mobility, draining sinus tract, redness or swelling of the vestibule. B. Normal gingival and periodontal condition, with no sensitivity to vestibular palpation, and no pain on percussion test.
- •Radiographic criteria:
- •No sign of radiolucency in periapical or furcation area.
- •No widening of PDL space or loss of lamina dura continuity.
- •No evidence of internal/external pathologic root resorption
排除标准
- •• Uncooperative children.
- •Children with systemic disease.
- •Lack of informed consent by the child patient's parent.
- •Refusal of participation.
- •Allergy from anesthetic agent.
- •Acute infection
结局指标
主要结局
Success of local anesthesia
时间窗: 10 minutes
Operator will record the LA as Successful if the scheduled restorative treatment was completed with standard treatment management strategies after administration of the trial anaesthetic. If treatment could not be continued after 10 minutes from when the LA was first administered, and the full 1.8 ml cartridge of the trial anaesthetic had been used, then the LA was considered unsuccessful
次要结局
- Child behavior during treatment(Intraoperative)
研究者
Doaa Moustafa
Resident at Pediatric Dentistry Department
Cairo University
相似试验
尚未招募
不适用
To Compare 2LA in dentistryCTRI/2022/06/043611SGT University
尚未招募
Unknown
Comparison of action of anaesthesia of 4% Articaine and 2% Lignocaine during extraction of upper jaw molars in elderly adults with severe toothacheCTRI/2023/04/051359Military Dental Centre
已完成
2 期
Comparison of the effect of two different anesthetics on palatal tissue numbness in childreThe amount of pain during tooth extraction.IRCT20180220038801N1Zahedan University of Medical Sciences44
已完成
不适用
Efficacy of 4% Articaine Terminal Anesthesia in the Lateral Jaw Region in ChildrenPrimary TeethInferior Alveolar NerveAnesthesia, DentalDental CariesNCT05423392University of Novi Sad60
已完成
4 期
Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine in Lower Molars With Irreversible PulpitsIrreversible PulpitisPainNCT01912755University of Campinas, Brazil50