跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01016288
NCT01016288已完成不适用

Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Performance of 22 Gauge Versus 25 Gauge EUS-FNA Needles

University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen9 个研究点 分布在 3 个国家目标入组 135 人开始时间: 2009年11月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
135
试验地点
9
主要终点
Value of EUS-FNA 22 Gauge needle comparing with EUS-FNA 25 Gauge needle in terms of cellularity and diagnostic yield for diagnosis of various pathologies.

研究概览

简要总结

The aim of the study is to compare the performance characteristics of EUS-FNA 22 Gauge needle and EUS FNA 25 Gauge needle in terms of cellularity and diagnostic yield for diagnosis of various pathologies, including lymph nodes, pancreatic, luminal and other lesions outlined by EUS.

详细描述

Tissue acquisition by Endoscopic ultrasound plays a central role in diagnosis of several pathologies; this is achieved by obtaining cytological material with fine needle aspiration (FNA) needles that are able to provide smears of malignant cells. Several needles are at present available including 19 Gauge, 22 Gauge and 25 Gauge needles. A 22 Gauge needle is at present the standard needle and most of the EUS-FNA results are based on FNA with this needle.

Twenty five Gauge needles presently available on the market are distinctly small, highly flexible and may be easier to penetrate hard pancreatic tumors. There even is anecdotal messages that this size of needle may be able to traverse relatively large vascular structures without major risk. However, there is very scant data on whether a 25 G needle is comparable to a standard 22 G needle in terms of specimen cellularity and quality. There is only one small randomized trial published as an abstract by Lee et al reporting no statistical significant difference in cellularity between the two groups of needle size as judged by 2 different cytologists. However, the conclusion is dubious because considerable bias may be present since both needles were used in the same lesion. There is therefore a need for a properly designed randomized study comparing different needle sizes.

This study is a prospective randomized multicenter study. Patients referred to one of the participating departments for an EUS examination will be included prospectively. Linear EUS examination will be done with a linear echoendoscope for lymph nodes, mediastinal, pancreatic and other intra-abdominal masses.

Tumor and lymph node characteristics will be carefully described: size (long axis), echogeneity (hypoechoic, hyperechoic, mixed), and echostructure (homogenous, in-homogenous, calcifications), shape (round, oval, triangular), border (regular, irregular).

EUS-guided cell sampling will be performed with a 22 G (Medi-Globe, Sonotip II) and 25 G (Medi-Globe, Sonotip II) needles under EUS and Colour-Doppler guidance.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Control
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 85 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients referred for an EUS examination and EUS-FNA of a solid mass lesion adjacent to the upper GI tract
  • Well informed signed consent for EUS-guided FNA

排除标准

  • Severe coagulopathy
  • Uncorrectable severe platelet dysfunction
  • Presence of large intervening vessels on color or power Doppler
  • Failure to provide informed consent

结局指标

主要结局

Value of EUS-FNA 22 Gauge needle comparing with EUS-FNA 25 Gauge needle in terms of cellularity and diagnostic yield for diagnosis of various pathologies.

时间窗: 6 months

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Peter Vilmann

Professor

University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen

研究点 (9)

Loading locations...

相似试验