Comparison Between Conventional Ultrasound and Remote Ultraportable ulTrasound for Abdominal Examination in the Context of Viral Hepatitis
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 招募中
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 102
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Comparison of TUP versus CUS for abdominal imaging in patients with viral hepatitis according to US LI-RADS categories ) for liver lesions
研究概览
简要总结
Comparison of abdominal US exam in patients with viral hepatitis between ultraportable US with teleradiology capacities (TUP) versus conventional ultrasound (CUS)
详细描述
Primary Objective The investigation seeks primarily to determine the performance of abdominal US examinations realized with TUP and CUS based on defined imaging criteria Secondary Objectives Evaluate satisfaction and comfort and reproducibility of use of the ultraportable US
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Informed Consent signed by the subject
- •All adult patients with viral hepatitis for which an ultrasound is planned
排除标准
- •Known or suspected non-compliance
- •Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc. of the participant,
- •Previous enrollment into the current study
结局指标
主要结局
Comparison of TUP versus CUS for abdominal imaging in patients with viral hepatitis according to US LI-RADS categories ) for liver lesions
时间窗: At the end of intervention
LI RADS categories No observation OR Only definitely benign observation(s) Observation(s) \< 10 mm in diameter, not definitely benign Observation(s) ≥ 10 mm in diameter, not definitely benign OR New thrombus in vein
次要结局
- video quality(At the end of intervention)
- liver visualization scores(At the end of intervention)
- examination time(At the end of intervention)
- liver surface nodularity(At the end of intervention)
- caudate lobe dimensions(At the end of intervention)
- biliary tract / gallbladder abnormalities(At the end of intervention)
- lymph nodes presence(At the end of intervention)
- free fluid(At the end of intervention)
- audio quality(At the end of intervention)
- agreement rates between reports(At the end of intervention)
- portal flow velocity(At the end of intervention)
- focal lesions(At the end of intervention)
- patient's satisfaction(At the end of intervention)
研究者
Naik Vietti Violi
PD & MERc, Executive Physician of Diagnostic And Interventional Radiology Department
University of Lausanne Hospitals