Differences in Morbidity Frequency Between a Necessity Endotracheal Suctioning Protocol Versus a Routine Endotracheal Suctioning Protocol in Hospital Pablo Tobon Uribe´s Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). A Randomized Controlled Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 92
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Primary Composite End Point
研究概览
简要总结
Morbidity frequency associated to a endotracheal suctioning is different between a necessity endotracheal suctioning protocol versus a routine endotracheal protocol.
详细描述
Endotracheal aspiration is a very useful procedure. It has several adverse events every time that aspiration is practiced. This trials wants to identify which protocol (necessity versus routine) could be better to practice in pediatrics intensive care unit with less risk.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 1 Month 至 14 Years（Child）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Children older than 1 month until 14 years old requiring orotracheal intubation
排除标准
- •High frequency ventilation mode
研究组 & 干预措施
Necessity endotracheal suctioning
Endotracheal suctioning depends on clinical manifestations
干预措施: Necessity endotracheal suctioning (Procedure)
Routine endotracheal suctioning
Endotracheal suctioning every two hours
干预措施: Routine endotracheal suctioning (Procedure)
结局指标
主要结局
Primary Composite End Point
时间窗: Every component for primary outcome can be assessed during or after suctioning is applied.For routine protocol, every 2 hours for necessity protocol will depend on patient´s necessity. The assessment was done in each patient during intubation period .
All causes of morbidity. Clinically identified as hypoxaemia, unplanned extubation, cardiac arrythmias, cardiac arrest. Measured as any change in patient´s monitor identified for ancillary nurse and/or confirmed directly by pediatrician.
次要结局
- Mechanical Ventilation Length as Days.(Every day while patient really is intubated.)
研究者
Gloria Lema
MD
Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe