Comparative Study Between Standard PCNL and Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery (ECIRS) in the Galdakaomodified Supine Valdivia (GMSV) Position for Complex Nephrolithiasis in Obese Patients
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 招募中
- 入组人数
- 100
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Efficacy of PCNL vs ECIRS
研究概览
简要总结
Primary aim: comparing the efficacy of standard PCNL and endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) in the Galdakao-modified Supine Valdivia (GMSV) position in a single session for the treatment of complex nephrolithiasis in obese patients.
Secondary aim: comparing safety and complications of standard PCNL and ECIRS in the GMSV.
详细描述
Complex nephrolithiasis including multiple peripheral or branched (partial or complete staghorn calculi) renal stones, is still currently an intractable problem for urologists to achieve stone-free status and minimize complication rates. According to the European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guidelines, retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is recommended as first-line treatment for renal stones < 2 cm, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is recommended as the gold standard for renal stones ≥ 2 cm in length.
Obesity has been identified as an independent risk factor for stone formation in the United States. Obesity (BMI >35) also places surgical patients at a greater risk of complications, because of the increased incidence in this group of diabetes, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, postoperative deep venous thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism, and because of poor radiographic visualization, obscure anatomic landmarks, more difficult renal access, and inferior stone-free rates.
Standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the recommended treatment by major guidelines. However, multiple tracts or sessions of PCNL were required to obtain a high stone-free rate (SFR) for complex renal calculi, especially staghorn stones, while procedure-related complications increased concomitantly. To acquire a higher SFR, full access to the entire intrarenal collecting system is the final goal of treatment for these patients suffering from multiple calyceal or peripheral satellite calculi, which is technically challenging by means of RIRS or PCNL monotherapy.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Participant)
盲法说明
1st patient in the PCNL group , 2nd patient in ECIRS group and so on .
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 60 Years(Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Partial or complete staghorn stones)
- •Guy's Stone Score III or IV)
- •Adult (18-60) years old patients
- •Obese & super-obese patients (BMI > 30 kg/m 2).
排除标准
- •Patients with congenital renal anomalies
结局指标
主要结局
Efficacy of PCNL vs ECIRS
时间窗: 2 days
Operative duration in minutes (from positioning to the end of the procedure) will be recorded for the two groups Stone-free status will be evaluated with a plain abdominal radiograph of the kidneys, ureters, and bladder (KUB) for radiopaque stones and NCCT for lucent stones before hospital discharge. Stone-free status is defined as no or small calyceal residuals of ≤ 4 mm (clinically insignificant residual fragment) without infection.
次要结局
- Safety and complication of PCNL Vs ECIRS(1 month.)
研究者
Moataz bellah Mohamed
Assistant lecturer
Ain Shams University
