跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2024/04/065212
CTRI/2024/04/065212尚未招募不适用

A randomised study to compare the effectiveness of conventional thenar eminence versus modified thenar eminence mask ventilation technique in obese patient after induction of general anaesthesia at SMS medical college Jaipur.

Sawai Mansingh Medical College and Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2024年4月26日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
60
试验地点
1
主要终点
1.comparing the difference in mean expired tidal volume between both study group.

研究概览

简要总结

Mask ventilation is the most basic, yet the most essential skill in airway management. It is primary technique of ventilation before tracheal intubation or insertion of any airway devices. Maintainance of airway patency and oxygenation are the major goals of mask ventilation in both elective and emergency conditions. It remains an important bridge to a definitive airway in cases of difficult intubation. Obesity is one of the predictor of Difficult mask ventilation. Obesity can be calculated based on Body mass index. Body mass index is given by the formula BMI=Body weight(kg)/Height(cm2).To achieve adequate mask ventilation during anaesthesia we are using different techniques of mask ventilation. There are multiple ways for hand positioning during mask ventilation, one of them is one- handed technique and other one is two handed technique. Two handed techniques are generally used in difficult mask ventilation since they provide a better mask-to-face seal and greater tidal volume. One such two handed thenar eminence technique are conventional and modified.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • 1.Patient willing to consent.
  • 2.Patient posted for elective surgery.
  • 3.Age between 18-60 years of either sex.
  • 4.BMI 25-35kg/m2 5.ASA Class I,II,III.

排除标准

  • 1.Patient part of other study group.
  • 2.non-co-operative patient.
  • 3.Anticipated difficult airway or difficult intubation.
  • 4.Patients having maxilla-mandibular deformities.
  • 5.Emergency surgeries.
  • 6.Pregnancy 7.Patient with acute and chronic respiratory disorders 8.Presence of airway mass or tumor 9.patient requiring rapid sequence induction or awake intubation.

结局指标

主要结局

1.comparing the difference in mean expired tidal volume between both study group.

时间窗: for 12 breaths

次要结局

  • 1.difference in mean peak airway pressure between both study group.(2.difference in ETCO2 between both study group.)

研究者

发起方
Sawai Mansingh Medical College and Hospital
申办方类型
Government medical college
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr Sunita Meena

SMS Medical College and attached Hospitals,Jaipur

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验