NCT01320163已完成不适用
Clinical Acceptability of I-GEL® in Pediatric Patients: Comparison of Clinical Performance With Classic-LMA™
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 108
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- airway leak pressure
研究概览
简要总结
This study is designed to determine whether a functional difference exists between the laryngeal mask airway (LMA)-Classic™ and i-gel in anesthetized children who have received neuromuscular blockade.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 1 Year 至 9 Years(Child)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •ASA I-II, Mallampati I or II, presenting for elective surgery who require general anesthesia in whom tracheal intubation is not necessary
排除标准
- •Patients will be excluded from the study if they present as Mallampati III or IV, ASA III-V or emergency status
- •upper airway abnormality
结局指标
主要结局
airway leak pressure
时间窗: within 5 min of insertion of each device
Airway leak pressure was determined by adjusting the expiratory valve of the breathing circle to 40 cmH2O (fixed fresh gas flow 3 L/min) and recording the pressure when equilibrium was reached.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Jin-Tae Kim
assisstant professor
Seoul National University Hospital
研究点 (2)
Loading locations...
相似试验
已完成
不适用
I-Gel vs Ambu Laryngeal Mask Airways in Infants and Children Undergoing Surgical ProceduresLaryngeal MasksNCT02938039King Saud University112
已完成
不适用
A Comparison of the I-gel and the Self-pressurised Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway in ChildrenGeneral AnesthesiaSupraglottic Airway DevicesNCT02140008Yonsei University80
Unknown
不适用
The Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy Between I-gel and LMA-Supreme, the Two Most Recently Developed Supraglottic Airway Devices, in InfantsElective Surgery of Short Duration (Less Than 2 hr) Undergoing General Anesthesia Using Supraglottic AirwayNCT01863316Yonsei University100
Unknown
不适用
The Effect Of I-Gel And Ambu Aura-I Use On Laryngofaryngeal MucosaMucosal DamageNCT04062747Bezmialem Vakif University40
已完成
不适用
To find out which technique of i-gel insertion is better then each otherCTRI/2019/05/019405All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur110
