跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03639532
NCT03639532已完成4 期

Is Ceramic-on-Ceramic THA Superior to Ceramic-on-Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene THA in Patients Less Than 55 Years Old?

Ewha Womans University0 个研究点目标入组 148 人开始时间: 2000年1月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
已完成
入组人数
148
主要终点
Harris hip score

研究概览

简要总结

Methods to reduce the revision rate of total hip arthroplasties (THAs) because of wear-related issues are important to examine, particularly because younger patients have a disproportionately high risk of revision. The investigators hoped to follow up patients and see if long-term Harris hip scores and WOMAC scores better in younger patients with a ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) THA compared with those with a ceramic-on-highly-cross-linked polyethylene (COP) THA.

详细描述

High success rates obtained in the general population have stimulated for total hip arthroplasty (THA) in young and active patients. Although there have been substantial improvements in THA, bearing surface wear and osteolysis are major factors limiting the durability of THAs in young and active patients. During the last decade, alternative bearings have been developed, including highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) and ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) bearings, with the potential to reduce wear and osteolysis in younger, more active patients.

Despite contemporary cementless THA with COC bearings giving excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes, there is concern about squeaking, fracture of the ceramic head or acetabular insert or fretting and corrosion (trunnionosis). Although HXLPE have been reported to reduce polyethylene wear, there is concerned about a potential decrease in toughness, tensile strength and resistance to the propagation of fatigue cracks in a long-term follow-up.

Several noncomparative studies of COC and COP THA have reported promising results in terms of Harris hip scores, radiographic findings, and survival rates, yet we are aware of no long-term comparative clinical studies with a COC THA and a COP THA in the same younger patients. This study aimed to see if long-term Harris hip scores and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) score better in younger patients with a COC THA compared with those with a COP THA.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Care Provider)

入排标准

年龄范围
20 Years 至 55 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • bilateral end-stage hip arthrosis

排除标准

  • inflammatory arthritis, foot and ankle disorders, dementia, stroke history, high dislocation of hip, patients older than 55 years

研究组 & 干预措施

COC

Experimental

for the arthritic hip of the patient, total hip arthroplasty(THA) with ceramic on ceramic(COC) bearing couple is implanted. The group with intervention COC THA.

干预措施: COC THA (Procedure)

COP

Active Comparator

for the arthritic hip of the patient, total hip arthroplasty(THA) with ceramic on highly cross-linked polyethylene bearing couple is implanted. The group with intervention COP THA.

干预措施: COP THA (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

Harris hip score

时间窗: 15 years after the intervention

The Harris Hip Score(HHS) was developed by William H. Harris to assess the results of hip surgery or hip replacement. The standard evaluation applies to various hip disabilities and methods of treatment in adults. The original version of the score was first published in 1969. 100 is the best score, and 0 is the worst possible score. HHS has a subset of pain(44 points), function(47 points), absence of deformity(4 points), and range of motion(5 points)

次要结局

  • WOMAC(Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) Scores(15 years after the intervention)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Young Hoo Kim

Professor

Ewha Womans University

相似试验

Ceramic-on-Ceramic Versus Ceramic-on-HXLPE THA | 临床试验