跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00769054
NCT00769054已完成4 期

Lokal Infiltrations Analgesi Med Ropivakain 1 % Versus Placebo VED Vaginale Descensusoperationer: ET Prospektivt Randomiseret, Dobbeltblindet, Placebo- Kontrolleret Studie

Hvidovre University Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 48 人开始时间: 2008年10月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
已完成
入组人数
48
试验地点
1
主要终点
Postoperative Pain during rest, coughing and ambulation

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to compare systematic local infiltration with ropivacaine or placebo in patients undergoing repair of posterior vaginal wall prolapse.

The hypothesis is that LIA technique is opioid-sparing and a better postoperative treatment.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • eligible for elective repair of posterior vaginal wall prolapse
  • able to speak and understand Danish
  • able to give informed consent

排除标准

  • alcohol or medical abuse
  • allergies to local anesthetics
  • age < 18 yrs.
  • intolerance to opioids

研究组 & 干预措施

1

Active Comparator

Local Infiltration with Ropivacaine

干预措施: Ropivacaine (Drug)

2

Placebo Comparator

Local Infiltration with Placebo

干预措施: Isotonic NaCl (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Postoperative Pain during rest, coughing and ambulation

时间窗: ½, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 h postoperatively

次要结局

  • Postoperative Nausea and Vomitus(½, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 h postoperatively)

研究者

申办方类型
Other

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验