CTRI/2021/05/033770尚未招募未知
Comparative evaluation of efficacy of gingival retraction using three different gingival retraction system with aluminium chloride astringent; retraction cord, copper wire reinforced retraction cord and astringent retraction paste: A randomised control study.
Hardik Maradiya0 个研究点目标入组 0 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
试验速览
- 阶段
- 未知
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
入选标准
- •Clinically healthy gingiva and periodontium around the teeth
- •Properly root canal treated teeth/vital teeth
- •Maxillary/Mandibular 1st molar
排除标准
- •Tipped, tilted or rotated abutment teeth
- •Patients with gingival recession, high plaque index, bleeding on probing, pernicious oral habits, hormonal imbalance, immunocompromised and debilitating pre-existing systemic conditions.
研究者
相似试验
已完成
3 期
Comparison of 3 different gingival retraction agentsCTRI/2023/09/057754Dr Unnati Agarwal36
已完成
不适用
Root coverage procedure on restored root surfacesGingival recession.Gingival recessionIRCT138812141248N2Vice chancellor for research, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences30
已完成
1 期
Comparison of treatmentof gum problem associated with cervical abrasion using resin modified glass ionomer cement and palatal graft and palatal graft alone.CTRI/2017/12/010890Gharat Mugdha Ranjankumar26
已完成
不适用
Treatment of gingival recession using two different soft tissue graft procedures: a comparative studyCTRI/2020/05/024978Dr Neelima Katti22
尚未招募
4 期
se of chitosan as periodontal dressing following periodontal flap surgeryCTRI/2020/04/024645Dr Bhavani