跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2023/08/056645
CTRI/2023/08/056645尚未招募Unknown

Comparison of safety margin of AIRQ versus I-Gel devices as conduit to microcuff endotracheal tube in paediatric surgeries-A randomised interventional study in Department of Anaesthesiology, SMS Medical College, Jaipur - Nil

Department of Anesthesiology SMS Medical College and attached Hospitals, Jaipur0 个研究点目标入组 0 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
Unknown
状态
尚未招募
发起方

研究概览

简要总结

暂无简介。

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional

入排标准

入选标准

  • ASA grade I & II.
  • Undergoing elective paediatric surgery requiring endotracheal intubation.
  • Parents or Caregivers willing to participate in the study.

排除标准

  • Children with airway related conditions such as trismus, limited mouth
  • opening, trauma or mass,anticipated difficult intubation.
  • Risk of gastric aspiration.
  • Children with upper respiratory tract infection.
  • If more than 3 attempts taken to intubate than exclude the particular patient.

研究者

发起方
Department of Anesthesiology SMS Medical College and attached Hospitals, Jaipur

相似试验