跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03969407
NCT03969407已完成不适用

Determination of the Best Positive End-expiratory Pressure (PEEP) Based on Oxygenation or Driving Pressure in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome After Cardiac Thoracic Surgery

Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 118 人开始时间: 2018年11月20日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
118
试验地点
1
主要终点
Best PEEP level based on the best driving pressure value

研究概览

简要总结

Determination of the best positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) based on oxygenation or driving pressure in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) after cardiothoracic surgery

The use of a positive end-expiratory pressure in acute respiratory distress syndrome is obvious in ARDS management. On the one hand it serves to fight against the reduction of functional residual capacity (FRC) and enable the limitation of hypoxia; and on the other hand it allows the limitation of "opening/closing" lesions in pulmonary alveoli which lead to increase "bio trauma".

However elevated PEEP has harmful effect such as hemodynamic effect on the right ventricle and distension on healthy part of the lung.Other adverse effects are: decreasing cardiac output, increased risk of barotrauma, and the interference with assessment of hemodynamic pressures.

Ideally the adjustment of PEEP level must be done by taking into account each patient characteristic. PEEP titration based on blood gas analysis is one of the most used techniques by physicians.

Current guidelines for lung-protective ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) suggest the use of low tidal volumes (Vt), set according to ideal body weight (IBW) of the patient, and higher levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to limit ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). However, recent studies have shown that ARDS patients who are ventilated according to these guidelines may still be exposed to forces that can induce or aggravate lung injury.

Driving pressure (DP) is the difference between the airway pressure at the end of inspiration (plateau pressure, Ppl) and PEEP.

Driving pressure may be a valuable tool to set PEEP. Independent of the strategy used to titrate PEEP, changes in PEEP levels should consider the impact on driving pressure, besides other variables such as gas exchange and hemodynamics. A decrease in driving pressure after increasing PEEP will necessarily reflect recruitment and a decrease in cyclic strain. On the contrary, an increase in driving pressure will suggest a non-recruitable lung, in which overdistension prevails over recruitment.

The main purposes of this study are to assess the optimal PEEP based on the best driving pressure or the best oxygenation.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
15 Years 至 100 Years(Child, Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • All Patients admitted for intensive care with acute respiratory distress syndrome intubated according to the criteria of the Berlin Consensus

排除标准

  • Undrained pneumothoraces
  • Hemodynamic instability defined by increased need of vasopressors and / or an systolic arterial pressure below 90 mmHg
  • Hypovolemic shock
  • Bronchopleural fistula
  • High intracranial pressure

结局指标

主要结局

Best PEEP level based on the best driving pressure value

时间窗: 1 DAY

Best PEEP level based on the best oxygenation value defined by the PaO2/FiO2 ratio.

时间窗: 1 DAY

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验