跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07083219
NCT07083219Enrolling By Invitation不适用

Aerobic Exercise and Pain Modulation: Examining the Impact on Pain Sensitivity in Healthy Adults

University of Texas, El Paso2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2025年8月15日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
Enrolling By Invitation
发起方
入组人数
60
试验地点
2
主要终点
Static QST Measure

研究概览

简要总结

Exercise-Induced Hypoalgesia (EIH) refers to reduced pain sensitivity following exercise, particularly in response to noxious stimuli. Various exercise modalities, including isometric, aerobic, and resistance training, contribute to this effect. Pain experienced during exercise may activate descending inhibitory pathways, leading to subsequent pain relief.

Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) is a behavioral measure of diffuse noxious inhibitory control (DNIC), where pain inhibits pain. It is proposed that pain within the exercising limb may serve as a conditioning stimulus, activating CPM. For instance, maximal handgrip exercise has been used to trigger CPM responses. In clinical settings, unpleasant physical therapy interventions like exercise, thermal modalities, and electrical stimulation may function through CPM mechanisms.

CPM predicts EIH in both young and older adults, with painful exercise reducing pressure pain ratings across age groups. Isometric exercise has also been shown to decrease CPM in individuals with systemic EIH, suggesting shared mechanisms.

Athletes exhibit higher pain thresholds and tolerance due to repeated exposure to high-intensity exercise. However, they demonstrate lower CPM activation, possibly as a compensatory response to chronic noxious input. This raises the question: Can repeated high-intensity aerobic exercise, perceived as painful, train the nervous system to enhance descending pain inhibition in non-athletes? While alterations in pain sensitivity related to analgesic-induced pain inhibition have been documented, the effects of continuous stimulation of central pain pathways via painful high intensity exercise, along with the mediating influence of psychosocial factors, remain underexplored. This study aims to investigate the central pain modulatory mechanisms (measured by QST) that have differential changes in participants who receive multiple sessions of high intensity aerobic exercise as an intervention compared to receiving single session. Additionally, the study will evaluate the impact of sociocultural factors, including optimism, pain catastrophizing, and marginalization on alterations in pain sensitivity.

详细描述

Background:

Pain and Its Burden Pain is a prevalent and complex health condition that significantly impacts individuals, families, and society as a whole. Of the 39.4 million adults experiencing pain most days and persisting for over three months, nearly two-thirds report it as "constantly present," with over half describing it as "unbearable and excruciating". Pain can be categorized into physiological and pathological types. Nociceptive and inflammatory pain are physiological responses that serve protective and adaptive functions, whereas pathological pain is considered non-protective and maladaptive.

Central Mechanisms in Pain Modulation Laboratory-based quantitative sensory testing (QST) evaluates sensory function using psychophysical methods, teasing out components of the nervous system that demonstrate loss or gain of sensory function contributing to pain. Pain-specific QST is categorized into static QST and dynamic QST. The static measure of QST is believed to provide simple and unidirectional assessments of static pain sensitivity in local regions and provide insight into peripheral mechanisms. Static QST measures include the determination of thresholds (pain thresholds and pain tolerance) and rating the intensity of the quantified stimulus. Pain processing is a complex system, and static QST provides one point on the scales of sensations. In addition, static QST is limited in capturing the pain modulatory ability of the central nervous system. Therefore, to overcome this limitation, dynamic QST measures come into play.

Dynamic QST provides insight into pain modulatory mechanisms such as pain facilitation or inhibition, or the extent to which the nervous system enhances or suppresses the pain. Dynamic QST assesses the central mechanism by temporal summation (TS) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM). TS assesses the heightened pain perception towards an identical repetitive noxious stimulus (heat or pressure) applied with consistent intensity and frequency (lower than 3 seconds). TS represents pain facilitation and is a behavioral measure of activity at the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. The CPM refers to the endogenous pain modulatory system that assesses the effects of the nociceptive system through the decrease in pain from one stimulus (test stimulus (thermal or electrical or tactile) to one part of the body due to the application of a second pain stimulus (conditioning stimulus (hot or cold bath or ischemia) applied at a distant another body part. CPM represents a pain inhibitory process and is a proxy measure of descending pain inhibition through the spino-bulbar- spinal loop. CPM may be a valuable tool in directing mechanistic-based approaches for treating painful conditions. For example, individuals with painful diabetic neuropathy and poorly functioning CPM have more significant analgesia when given duloxetine, a medication that augments conditioned pain modulation. Additionally, identifying and treating the source of pain is associated with positive changes in CPM. Healthy individuals demonstrate more efficient CPM when compared with people in pain and a systematic review of adults with chronic pain revealed that CPM efficiency improves after a reduction in clinical pain. For example, total hip arthroplasty for treating painful osteoarthritis reduces joint pain and improves post-operative CPM. Collectively, these studies suggest that the CPM test has the potential to predict risk and treatment outcomes for chronic pain, therefore CPM may be considered an essential treatment moderator and mediator. The activation of central mechanisms, particularly endogenous inhibitory systems, is proposed as a fundamental process underlying various pain management interventions. Descending pain inhibitory systems, which are part of central mechanisms, play a crucial role in mediating the analgesic effects of interventions such as manual therapy. Manual therapy stimulates afferent neuronal inputs that activate the central nervous system's descending pathways to inhibit pain. Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) shares a similar mechanism, inhibiting pain through descending modulation pathways.

Role of Aerobic Exercise in Pain Inhibition The impact of exercise on pain reduction is well-documented, with initial investigations and subsequent evidence in both animal and human studies. Exercise has proven effective in managing pain associated with various chronic conditions, including fibromyalgia, chronic neck pain, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and chronic low back pain. Additionally, it has been shown to prevent chronic low back pain (CLBP) recurrence and mitigate the progression of chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions. This pain-reducing effect, known as Exercise-Induced Hypoalgesia (EIH), involves several underlying mechanisms. The endogenous opioid system is the most extensively studied mechanism explaining EIH. Another proposed mechanism involves endocannabinoids, which modulate pain through an inhibitory feedback loop that reduces glutamate release at nociceptive synapses. It has been reported that increases in circulating endocannabinoids following exercise were associated with reduced pain perception, as evidenced by pressure pain thresholds (PPT) and decreased thermal heat temporal summation. Acute aerobic exercise has also been shown to enhance Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) analgesia in healthy individuals. Studies suggest that higher CPM efficiency correlates with greater EIH. For example, it is found that active participants exhibited higher EIH and more effective CPM after 15 minutes of cycling at 75% VO₂max, compared to inactive participants. Similarly, it has been observed that enhanced CPM analgesia in athletes versus non-athletes, further linking CPM efficiency to physical activity levels. This study aims to investigate the effects of repeated high-intensity aerobic exercise on CPM analgesia in non-athletic populations, addressing gaps in understanding how exercise-induced pain modulation operates beyond athletic contexts.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 50 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • pain-free
  • between 18-50 years old.

排除标准

  • Participants will not be excluded based on race or gender but will be excluded if they meet any of the following
  • non-English speaking
  • systemic medical condition is known to affect sensation
  • regular use of prescription pain medication to manage pain
  • current or history of chronic pain condition
  • currently using blood thinning medication
  • any blood clotting disorder such as hemophilia
  • any contraindication to the application of ice or cold packs, such as uncontrolled hypertension, cold urticaria, cryoglobulinemia, paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria, and circulatory compromise
  • involved in vigorous physical activities like heavy lifting, digging, aerobics or fast bicycling
  • Any lung or respiratory condition that impairs exercise capacity, including but not limited to asthma.

结局指标

主要结局

Static QST Measure

时间窗: 2 weeks

Slow Ramp: A slowly ramping thermal stimulus will be delivered to the skin of the participant's dominant forearm using a computer controlled TSAII NeuroSensory Analyzer from Medoc, Inc. Thermal stimuli will increase from a baseline of 35 degrees Celsius to a maximum of 51 degree Celsius in ascending one-degree intervals, each stimulus presented for 1-sec. Participants will be instructed to indicate when the sensation first changes from warmth to pain (pain threshold) and when the sensation becomes "so painful you can no longer tolerate it or So painful that you can't bear it anymore" (pain tolerance). Pressure Pain Threshold: An algometer with a 1 cm diameter rubber tip will be applied at 1 kg/s to the dominant hand at the first dorsal interosseous muscle. Participants will be instructed to indicate when the sensation first changes from pressure to pain (pain threshold). This procedure will be repeated two times, and the average pressure to threshold will be analyzed.

Dynamic QST Measure

时间窗: 2 weeks

Pressure pain threshold will be measured using a 1 cm² algometer tip applied at 1 kg/s to the dominant foot's web space. Pressure increases until participants report pain at 40/100, then stops. This is repeated twice, and the average is used. For the conditioning stimulus, participants immerse their non-dominant hand in circulating cold water (6°C for males, 8°C for females) for 60 seconds, across four trials. Pain and unpleasantness ratings are collected each trial. Water temperature is adjusted in subsequent trials if ratings are too high or low. Between immersions, the hand is removed for 30 seconds while PPT is reassessed. Conditioned pain modulation is calculated as the difference between post-conditioning and pre-conditioning pain thresholds, with negative values indicating efficient pain inhibition.

Temporal Summation

时间窗: 2 weeks

Temporal sensory summation (TSS): 6 heat pulses will be applied to the dominant hand of the patient. To ensure temporal summation, an inter-stimulus interval of 2 seconds will be used with temperatures starting at 39°C and increasing to 50°C (the TSA medoc maintains 10°C/sec rate in this range which is sufficient for maintaining the desired inter-stimulus interval). The participants will be asked to rate the magnitude of their delayed (second) pain sensation following each heat pulse using the numeric rating scale. These response ratings are believed to be primarily C-fiber mediated. The magnitude of TSS is calculated by subtracting the rating of intensity at pulse 1 from the peak rating given during the 6 pulses (ie simple slope of summation).

Aftersenstations

时间窗: 2 weeks

The participants will be asked to rate the magnitude of their pain sensation following the removal of the thermode. The research assistant will cue the participants to rate their pain every 10 seconds. These ratings will be obtained for 60 seconds. These response ratings are also primarily C-fiber mediated.

Pressure Pain Threshold Upper Extrimity

时间窗: 2 weeks

An algometer with a 1 cm diameter rubber tip will be applied at 1 kg/s to the dominant hand at the first dorsal interosseous muscle. Participants will be instructed to indicate when the sensation first changes from pressure to pain (pain threshold). This procedure will be repeated two times, and the average pressure to threshold will be analyzed.

Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R)

时间窗: 2 weeks

The LOT-R is a 10-item self-report scale that measures how optimistic or pessimistic a person feels about the future. It measures trait optimism. The LOT-R uses a 5-point Likert scale, with 0 meaning "strongly disagree" and 4 meaning "strongly agree". Items are summed, yielding a range from 0 to 32 and Higher scores indicate greater levels of optimism

State Optimism Measure (SOM)

时间窗: 2 weeks

The SOM is a 7-item measure that measures a person's state of optimism. It scored from 1 to 7 and higher scores indicate with a higher score indicating greater state optimism. It has been shown to be reliable and valid in both general and clinical populations

The Perceived Societal Marginalization (PSM)

时间窗: 2 weeks

The PSM scale is a tool that measures how people perceive their social group's lack of recognition and insignificance in the areas of culture, politics, and the economy. The scale's items are scored on a 6-point Likert scale, with 1 representing "strongly disagree" and 6 representing "strongly agree". A higher total score indicates a higher level of perceived societal marginalization

Anxiety about Pain Testing

时间窗: 2 weeks

A single item visual analogue scale (VAS) for Anxiety about Pain Testing was administered before every session of the protocol. The VAS was 100mm long and participants were instructed that the anchors were "no anxiety about pain testing" on the left and "worst anxiety about pain testing imaginable" on the right.

Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)

时间窗: 2 weeks

The Pain Catastrophizing Scale is a 13-item questionnaire in which individuals respond to a statement on a five-point ordinal scale from 0 to 4. Individuals respond to the question in terms of a prior painful episode, and higher scores indicate higher pain catastrophizing levels

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
University of Texas, El Paso
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Priyanka Rana, PT, MPT, PhD

Assistant Professor

University of Texas, El Paso

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验